Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I think six months. You're causing a public disturbance, or inciting to violence.
Now, if they actually try to get TO Trump, I think that's ten years. Minimum.
Why are you so hateful? Really nasty comments there, usually a reflection of the person saying them. Since you seem confused, 500 odd rep points for someone who has been posting for 8 years is not something to brag about.
You have to remember a (large percentage ) of Trump supporters carry a lot of anger.
Political dissension is now an act of terrorism? You do know that you sound like a fascist when you spout these kinds of things, right?
When you have 25 thousand people in a venue and have disruptive dissenters causing chaos, it poses a danger to everyone there. Pandemonium sets in, people can be trampled, get hurt and even killed by these actions.
None. JAMS14 is expanding on the reason there should be none. Protest is a civil right, and since the character of a man is known by his attitude to criticism, protest is important. It's not the same "shutting down" an event.
I remember quite a few Tea Party protests in Washington after the election, but it was never suggested that that any of those protesters be arrested. Why is that? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_protests
I was there for the first two Tea Party protests (first one had over 1 million) ... and the WORST thing about that event was the placement of the porta potties ... upwind of the event. No fights, No trash ... unlike the following week of a black protest. Yeah, I know, here comes the racist sheet in an effort to ignore the fact of what happened or should I say, deflect attention from the trash left behind. The issue is NOT what the event was or was about, it is about the garbage left behind. One million + Tea Party folks did not do that.
When you have 25 thousand people in a venue and have disruptive dissenters causing chaos, it poses a danger to everyone there. Pandemonium sets in, people can be trampled, get hurt and even killed by these actions.
There are protesters at other candidate's rallies and they are removed quietly without a lot of spectacle. Trump, however, makes them a part of his "show," making sure to draw everyone's attention to them and yelling things like, "Throw them out! Throw them out!"
See the difference? The former way of dealing with them causes no chaos. The Trump way purposefully makes a huge show of it, encouraging the audience to partake in the action, and that's when you get chaos.
Why is it that every other candidate can deal with protests without violence, but Trump cannot?
"How much jail time should a Trump protestor get?"
Less than the jail time Hillary Clinton should get.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
