Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-14-2016, 12:00 PM
 
15,530 posts, read 10,499,357 times
Reputation: 15812

Advertisements

"Hillary is NOT the Best Pick for the Democratic Party"

What ever happened to Jim Webb, he seemed interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-14-2016, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,628,733 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by elan View Post
"Hillary is NOT the Best Pick for the Democratic Party"

What ever happened to Jim Webb, he seemed interesting.
Actually he was. He is now talking about a third-party run which probably can't happen.

Hia demeanor was peaky a bit too rough for the Democratic Party. But he would have added an interesting dimension to the debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2016, 12:54 PM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,411,792 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by richrf View Post
Tone deaf to the terms of millions who are saying that wecan't take it anymore. What more financial repression do you and your candidate want foist on hard working people? More insurance and medical costs they cannot afford? More bailouts for Wall Street? We have reached critical mass and I would suggest that Clinton and more of these repressive financial conditions will push our nation over the edge on anger. It's amazing how insensitive so-called progressives can be. Progressives are now becoming Repressives, a dangerous direction to go.
If you think Trump would be better for poor people you are sorely mistaken. He opposes tax cuts for the poor. He opposes minimum wage increase which helps all lower income hourly workers. He supports trade wars which would increase prices on consumer goods and squeeze the poor even more, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-14-2016, 01:26 PM
 
Location: Chicago
5,559 posts, read 4,628,733 times
Reputation: 2202
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
If you think Trump would be better for poor people you are sorely mistaken. He opposes tax cuts for the poor. He opposes minimum wage increase which helps all lower income hourly workers. He supports trade wars which would increase prices on consumer goods and squeeze the poor even more, etc.
I think the thread is about whether Clinton is the best choice for the Democratic Party. Only if Democrats and Independents are in love with the idea of increasing the wealth and income of the top 1%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top