Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Originally Posted by Asgardian;43775357[eFu_eieziqg[/youtube
Unfortunately Pirro has no credibility at all regarding Hillary Clinton. She has an agenda--a bitter jealous one.
"...On December 21, 2005, after continuing pressure from party chiefs, a lagging fundraising effort, and polls showing she would be defeated by Clinton (a Quinnipiac University poll found Pirro would lose to Clinton 62 percent to 30 percent), Jeanine Pirro dropped out of the Senate race just two months after she started her campaign. “I have decided that my law enforcement background better qualifies me for a race for New York State attorney general than a race for the United States Senate,” she said in a statement. Spencer was eventually chosen as the Republican Party's nominee for the U.S. Senate.
On May 31, 2006, Pirro, unopposed for the GOP nomination, became the party’s official candidate for attorney general by acclamation at the GOP convention. She also held the nominations of the New York Conservative and Independence Parties. However, in the general election, Pirro lost to the Democratic nominee, former Clinton Housing and Urban Development Secretary Andrew Cuomo 58%–39%..."
Unfortunately Pirro has no credibility at all regarding Hillary Clinton. She has an agenda--a bitter jealous one.
"...On December 21, 2005, after continuing pressure from party chiefs, a lagging fundraising effort, and polls showing she would be defeated by Clinton (a Quinnipiac University poll found Pirro would lose to Clinton 62 percent to 30 percent), Jeanine Pirro dropped out of the Senate race just two months after she started her campaign. “I have decided that my law enforcement background better qualifies me for a race for New York State attorney general than a race for the United States Senate,” she said in a statement. Spencer was eventually chosen as the Republican Party's nominee for the U.S. Senate.
On May 31, 2006, Pirro, unopposed for the GOP nomination, became the party’s official candidate for attorney general by acclamation at the GOP convention. She also held the nominations of the New York Conservative and Independence Parties. However, in the general election, Pirro lost to the Democratic nominee, former Clinton Housing and Urban Development Secretary Andrew Cuomo 58%–39%..."
Jeanine Ferris married Albert Pirro, a lobbyist, in 1975. The couple had a son and a daughter. In 2000, Pirro’s husband was convicted of federal tax evasion and conspiracy of over $1 million, which was seen as possibly hurting her legal and political career prospects. The conviction was so damning to the future of her political career that she seriously considered resigning from her position as a state D.A. and taking up a more lucrative post in the private sector. In the midst of her 2006 state attorney general campaign, Pirro revealed that she was the subject of a federal investigation into whether she illegally taped her husband’s conversations in order to catch him committing adultery. The couple announced they were separating in November 2007 and finalized their divorce in 2013.
Pirro received significant political contributions from her husband’s associates—after his release from prison—throughout her numerous unsuccessful attempts to hold higher office. These include numerous contractors and realtors who had done business with her husband on previous occasions.
George Stephanapolus and Chris Matthews should then be prohibited from reporting anything about the GOP since both worked in Democrat administrations.
Who here is saying Pirro should be prohibited from giving her opinion? Oh, that's right, absolutely no one. She's free to opine as she wishes, but it's always helpful to understand when someone has a personal history with a candidate she routinely denigrates. In this case, it definitely does sound like sour grapes.
Thanks, Enigma777, for that interesting background info. It puts everything Pirro says about Clinton into a different perspective.
Who here is saying Pirro should be prohibited from giving her opinion? Oh, that's right, absolutely no one. She's free to opine as she wishes, but it's always helpful to understand when someone has a personal history with a candidate she routinely denigrates. In this case, it definitely does sound like sour grapes.
Thanks, Enigma777, for that interesting background info. It puts everything Pirro says about Clinton into a different perspective.
I find her weekend show to be very entertaining. Last weekend she went out to talk to some blue collar workers in NYC to see who they were voting for and it was funny as all get out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
