U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-20-2016, 11:50 PM
 
4,628 posts, read 5,363,629 times
Reputation: 2260

Advertisements

This website has links to a good number of 2016 election fraud cases.

https://electionfraud2016.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-14-2016, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Upstate NY
35,439 posts, read 10,481,794 times
Reputation: 33515
Not surprisingly, the MNM isn't reporting on the current court case alleging Minnesota voter fraud in 2008 (remember when Franken stole that election?) because it doesn't fit their narrative that there isn't any. There's also foot-dragging and attempts to conceal evidence that preclude timely resolutions of such cases.


Rampant Voter Fraud Alleged In Minnesota | Power Line
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2016, 07:36 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,961 posts, read 13,911,625 times
Reputation: 7008
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmountains View Post
This website has links to a good number of 2016 election fraud cases.

https://electionfraud2016.wordpress.com/
Those are bloggers, not proof of anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2016, 10:33 AM
 
Location: New York
2,251 posts, read 4,313,917 times
Reputation: 1610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Those are bloggers, not proof of anything.
My $00.02 this is a free "Wordpress" website - shows alot of effort, especially reporting on voter fraud with Bernie Sanders. If they really wanted to get their message out and show up in google search engines. Pay for a domain and hosting.



.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2016, 10:49 AM
 
2,205 posts, read 1,125,813 times
Reputation: 576
If Bernie supporters are going to keep pushing this false narrative that Hillary/DNC, at least don't apply double standard and admit FIRST that they cheated in Iowa, New Hampshire and Oklahoma first before they accuse Hillary since sanders got more favourable results than early exit polls.


Can conspiracists even use some logic to think?
The primaries are run by respective state government
To cheat you really need to concoct massive number of people in different states to cheat for you
And u really need to have incentive to do it
Please use some logic, if you need to cheat, You will only cheat to win narrowly, because there is no point in cheating if you end up winning by 3.7 million votes. Why would u risk everything to cheat when you are winning?

All early exit polls show Hillary massively in many southern states, and after that, her pledged delegate is so large making it very stupid for anyone to commit fraud, because you are winning already, why are u risking everything to cheat?
So I hope Bernie supporters grow some logic.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2016, 11:09 AM
 
2,205 posts, read 1,125,813 times
Reputation: 576
Bernie supporters... Please if you have any integrity, stop making up numbers to frame the DNC over and over again

Looking at the link OP posted
Bernie supporters lie about Bernie sanders getting 10% more votes in end of day exit poll (early exit poll) vs final results in Ohio.

Well, according to early exit poll when polls close, it was Clinton 53, Sanders 46
(Live coverage at 1:38:15:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MngP7Og8X-g )

Final results according to state government website: Clinton 56.1, Sanders 43.1 (Ohio Democratic Delegation 2016)

Please tell me how there is a 10% difference when it was only 2.9%

Why do Bernie supporters keep making up fake numbers all the time????

At the end of the day, he Lost and there was no way he won
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2016, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Denver CO
21,159 posts, read 11,761,610 times
Reputation: 32142
The funniest part is that it's addressed to "President-elect Sanders." So not only did he supposed win the Democratic nomination that he lost by millions of votes, he has apparently also won the general election that won't be held for another 4 months.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2016, 12:22 PM
 
4,628 posts, read 5,363,629 times
Reputation: 2260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Modification Specialist View Post
f they really wanted to get their message out and show up in google search engines. Pay for a domain and hosting.
Google is known to be pro-Clinton. There was a thread here about how Google search restricts results of search using negative words and Clinton's name.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2016, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Texas
3,253 posts, read 1,724,431 times
Reputation: 3080
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalk View Post
If Bernie supporters are going to keep pushing this false narrative that Hillary/DNC, at least don't apply double standard and admit FIRST that they cheated in Iowa, New Hampshire and Oklahoma first before they accuse Hillary since sanders got more favourable results than early exit polls.


Can conspiracists even use some logic to think?
The primaries are run by respective state government
To cheat you really need to concoct massive number of people in different states to cheat for you
And u really need to have incentive to do it
Please use some logic, if you need to cheat, You will only cheat to win narrowly, because there is no point in cheating if you end up winning by 3.7 million votes. Why would u risk everything to cheat when you are winning?

All early exit polls show Hillary massively in many southern states, and after that, her pledged delegate is so large making it very stupid for anyone to commit fraud, because you are winning already, why are u risking everything to cheat?
So I hope Bernie supporters grow some logic.
Sure here's some logic.

Exit polls used by all the news networks (neo conservative and neo liberal alike) come from the National Election Pool which contracted out to Edison Research and Mitofsky International. These are NGO's which are not liable for accurate polling. In fact, many countries besides our own, use exit poll data as one of many safeguards against voter fraud. I suppose voter fraud is impossible in the United States so we don't bother with things like universal checks and balances?

As far as cheating, I posted a video before of a man who testified in court about how he was contracted to write a program to make it simple to change the results on electronic voting machines, in fact they even demonstrated it. Most voting machines are owned by private companies, Die Bold and Election Systems and Software. How do we know they cannot manipulate the vote? I don't know, lets just have faith that it's not possible.

Here's some more logic. Many Clinton supporters somehow tout that even if there was fraud she won the popular vote by your 3.7 million votes. But if there really is cheating how many of those votes can we verify are legitimate? Again, we can't. Even if she won the popular vote by 1 legitimate vote, we wouldn't know. A few hundred false votes over many counties could add up quick. Not all states have the same checks and balances in place (like backup paper ballots), but this doesn't seem a concern to anyone either.

We also learned from California that not even the poll workers seem to know what they're doing. Inept poll workers and ill equipped poll stations in California apparently couldn't be a threat to a strong democracy.

https://youtu.be/eB3SWBDYung

But say they tried to cheat anyway and were flagged by an auditor here's a video of said red flag in Chicago. Nobody seems too concerned about the notion of changing the hand tally to match the electronic tally. By the time they'll investigate we'll likely be well into the term of our new president.

Voter registrations dropped or changed in New York and Arizona? Meh, we'll maybe fix it next time, the votes don't matter that much anyway.

https://youtu.be/OSNTauWPkTc?t=1643

How anybody, in a truly democratic society could be so complacent when faced with these events and allegations baffles me. It's not about Sanders, Sanders doesn't matter if we can't prove we have legitimate elections.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-14-2016, 10:22 PM
 
10,812 posts, read 8,056,502 times
Reputation: 17010
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmountains View Post
Google is known to be pro-Clinton. There was a thread here about how Google search restricts results of search using negative words and Clinton's name.
The tin-foil hats of course fell for that one.

Google Manipulates Searches for Hillary Clinton : snopes.com
Quote:
While it's true that Google Autocomplete will not show "Hillary Clinton Criminal" when searching for "Hillary Clinton Cri," we couldn't get Google Autocomplete to label anyone a criminal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top