Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon
Today Blitzer hammered Katrina Pierson asking the same question different ways and he wasn't listening to her answer. Apparently he didn't like her answer.
I am not naive enough to think that Trump doesn't have legitimate things you can criticize him over, but CNN is obsessed lately with it.
Hillary says something that is 100% untrue about Trump and they ignored it, or I didn't see it. Trump brings up a dirt on Hillary that isn't 100% proven and CNN blasts Trump for it for hours.
|
Several weeks ago, Anderson 360/CNN, went so far as to say that there was no violence at the Nevada convention, when clearly Bernie supporters were throwing chairs and starting fights. In addition, after the convention the party’s headquarters was vandalized with graffitti and the chairperson received threatening phone calls. Yet, he went on to say and reiterated that there was no violence there
, dork.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse
The attacks on Trump are silly and have no connection to the issues of the election. They are simply nonsense and here at C-D, I'm embarrassed for some of the posters with the gossipy crap they post.
The information coming out and being refreshed on Hillary Clinton is very serious, VERY SERIOUS and would impact the presidency if she were elected. Hillary a proven liability over and over again. One more time what I heard "You can put lipstick on a pig but when you finish, you still have a pig." and that applies to the posts here who try to play her up as anything but what she is.
Most of the anti-Trump is nonsense but it isn't like they can go in the other direction with "pro Clinton" because that might be one or two posts at most because the material just isn't there to support that.
|
Comic relief at best.