U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-16-2016, 07:38 AM
 
26,184 posts, read 8,913,327 times
Reputation: 9116

Advertisements

It has removed the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation from its watch list, a red flag used by the charity watchdog to signal to donors that questions have been raised about a groupís operations.

To crooked to recommend or even figure out what is going on ? OH YEAH

https://philanthropy.com/article/Cha...Removes/234700
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-16-2016, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Center City, Philadelphia
4,625 posts, read 2,762,070 times
Reputation: 2978
the story says they were removed from the watch list because of false reports putting it on the list haha. Thanks for settling this stupid made up issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2016, 07:48 AM
 
26,184 posts, read 8,913,327 times
Reputation: 9116
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
the story says they were removed from the watch list because of false reports putting it on the list haha. Thanks for settling this stupid made up issue.
If you thought this was a stupid made up issue you wouldn't be making up lies and responding.
I know you wouldn't because you're smart. You prove it in every post.
Red flags are not red flags they are just a color. Got it !!!

There was high interest in the Clinton Foundation’s placement on the watchlist, Ms. Struck said.

https://philanthropy.com/article/Cha...Removes/234700
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2016, 07:56 AM
 
Location: Center City, Philadelphia
4,625 posts, read 2,762,070 times
Reputation: 2978
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
If you thought this was a stupid made up issue you wouldn't be making up lies and responding.
I know you wouldn't because you're smart. You prove it in every post.
Red flags are not red flags they are just a color. Got it !!!

There was high interest in the Clinton Foundationís placement on the watchlist, Ms. Struck said.

https://philanthropy.com/article/Cha...Removes/234700
They were put on the "watch list" because of "reports". Once the reports were investigated.... they were removed from the list because there was no evidence found.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2016, 08:07 AM
 
26,184 posts, read 8,913,327 times
Reputation: 9116
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
They were put on the "watch list" because of "reports". Once the reports were investigated.... they were removed from the list because there was no evidence found.
Not true at all !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2016, 08:35 AM
 
16,655 posts, read 8,506,818 times
Reputation: 9521
Make a healthy donation, get your contracts approved. No laws broke. Unethical? no doubt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2016, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,715 posts, read 11,522,600 times
Reputation: 5606
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
the story says they were removed from the watch list because of false reports putting it on the list haha. Thanks for settling this stupid made up issue.
The pro-Trump cheerleaders have to post made up issues because Trump can't compete on policy and wants to redirect away from his complete lack of qualification for the office that he seeks.


Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
If you thought this was a stupid made up issue you wouldn't be making up lies and responding.
I know you wouldn't because you're smart. You prove it in every post.
Red flags are not red flags they are just a color. Got it !!!

There was high interest in the Clinton Foundationís placement on the watchlist, Ms. Struck said.

https://philanthropy.com/article/Cha...Removes/234700
It's your link and it said that the Clinton Foundation was removed from their watch list because information provided meets their requirements for removal.

Did I mention that the link was yours? You own link proves that your "red flags" aren't red flags.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2016, 08:49 AM
 
26,184 posts, read 8,913,327 times
Reputation: 9116
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
The pro-Trump cheerleaders have to post made up issues because Trump can't compete on policy and wants to redirect away from his complete lack of qualification for the office that he seeks.




It's your link and it said that the Clinton Foundation was removed from their watch list because information provided meets their requirements for removal.

Did I mention that the link was yours? You own link proves that your "red flags" aren't red flags.
Not true at all. Reading is fundamental. So is reading comprehension. YOU FAIL.

Read it again and try to understand what being removed means. In bold is correct.

Underlined : "You own link proves that your "red flags" aren't red flags" is not correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2016, 09:19 AM
 
11,921 posts, read 5,662,817 times
Reputation: 6938
The Clinton Foundation was put on the Watch List in 2015 - then it was removed from the Watch List for sone odd reason. Now it's not on the Charity Navigator rated list at all ... And just happened. A new series of reports on the Clinton Foundation is beginning to be released after a 15 month review. There will be 40 reports.

The analyst is Charles Otel, he investigates the internal of Companies to find out if the reported numbers are legitimate for invest ate reports. He exposed what AIG & GE were doing to cook their books.

He is saying that his investigation shows the Clinton Foundation is a Fraud.
This will be a major problem for the Clintons & it's likely that others will be sucked into it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-16-2016, 09:28 AM
 
69,372 posts, read 55,339,374 times
Reputation: 9358
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
the story says they were removed from the watch list because of false reports putting it on the list haha. Thanks for settling this stupid made up issue.
I'd say having tens of millions of dollars in donations, not reported, wouldnt really be classified as a false reason..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:18 PM.

© 2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top