Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
When the Democrats decided to double down on corruption and lies they unfortunately choose the wrong battlefield. They've meet their match. It's always a gamble when a party chooses corruption as their road to follow. Not everyone wants to go down that road.
Ugly Senate poll out today for the republicans. Evan Bayh is up 21 points in the first head to head poll in the Hoosier state.
Evan Bayh starts the 2016 campaign well-regarded by a broad swath of Hoosier voters and has a strong 54%-33% lead with the potential to GROW his support.
When the Democrats decided to double down on corruption and lies they unfortunately choose the wrong battlefield. They've meet their match. It's always a gamble when a party chooses corruption as their road to follow. Not everyone wants to go down that road.
Of course it's been noticed but they're not going to talk about that other than to minimize it as much as possible now that you brought it up.
I guess they figure by attacking Melania they are going to win the woman's vote.
"They" are not attacking her. She (the campaign) plagierized. It has been called out as it should have. Don't blame others for the Trump campaign's incompetence (I'm being kind).
Also I like how above it's noted that "Trump is up 2 polls." I guess so, he's up by 1 in two polls. I guess that would be noteworthy if Clinton weren't up by more in more polls.
New York Times Launches Election Model to be updated daily to election
The Times has a state based computer model, similar to Nate Silver's 538. There's an interesting feature that will publish the current odds that different models show for the individual states.
Sources from left to right on the comparative grid are:
New York Times
538
Predict wise (PW)
Princeton Electon Consortium (PEC)
Cook Political Report
Rothenberg Gonzalez
Larry Sabato
Current NYT model chances of winning:
Clinton 76% Trump 24%
Trump has 72 possible combinations to reach 270 electoral votes and victory.
Hillary has 945.
New York Times Launches Election Model to be updated daily to election
The Times has a state based computer model, similar to Nate Silver's 538. There's an interesting feature that will publish the current odds that different models show for the individual states.
From left to right on the comparative grid are the New York. Times computer analysis, three other computer based analyses' (538, PredictWise and the Princeton Election Consortium), plus three non-computer based analyses (Cook, Rothenberg/Gonzelez and Sabato.
New York Times
538
Predict wise (PW)
Princeton Electon Consortium (PEC)
Cook Political Report
Rothenberg Gonzalez
Larry Sabato
Current NYT model chances of winning:
Clinton 76% Trump 24%
Trump has 72 possible combinations to reach 270 electoral votes and victory.
Hillary has 945.
I accidentally inferred that the seven other surveys listed were "sources" for the New York Times Election Model. In actuality, all are independent and are only listed for comparative purposes.
"They" are not attacking her. She (the campaign) plagierized. It has been called out as it should have. Don't blame others for the Trump campaign's incompetence (I'm being kind).
Also I like how above it's noted that "Trump is up 2 polls." I guess so, he's up by 1 in two polls. I guess that would be noteworthy if Clinton weren't up by more in more polls.
Yes they are attacking her loop like fools that they are.
Good job by the Democrats on nominating such a corrupt politician that is running even with Trump. You live by corruption and you die by corruption.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.