Who will be the DNC nominee one Hillary gets indicted?
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The problem is, this is not a "scandal". It is a criminal investigation by the FBI. Why is that so hard to understand? It is not a republican witch hunt against the poor old Clintons. Again, I repeat, this is a FBI criminal investigation.
You are exactly right . . . . it's just a criminal investigation. Nothing will likely come of it, since Loretta Lynch is itching to exercise her prosecutorial discretion. No indictment, no conviction, no nothing.
You are exactly right . . . . it's just a criminal investigation. Nothing will likely come of it, since Loretta Lynch is itching to exercise her prosecutorial discretion. No indictment, no conviction, no nothing.
Mick
Aww, there you go again, Mick, dashing the right wing's fondest wet dream. What a killjoy you are!
You are exactly right . . . . it's just a criminal investigation. Nothing will likely come of it, since Loretta Lynch is itching to exercise her prosecutorial discretion. No indictment, no conviction, no nothing.
Mick
So you are saying if the FBI recommends indicted and Lynch decides not to prosecute for political reasons, you are ok with that? You would be fine with a President that the FBI believes they have enough evidence to convict criminal charges on? Criminal charges on acts that could have or did put our country at risk for personal gain? That would be ok with you?
So you are saying if the FBI recommends indicted and Lynch decides not to prosecute for political reasons, you are ok with that? You would be fine with a President that the FBI believes they have enough evidence to convict criminal charges on? Criminal charges on acts that could have or did put our country at risk for personal gain? That would be ok with you?
Sounds most......well, let's just be nice and say very dishonest/self-serving, doesn't it? And "justice" today in my view is a most subjective endeavor, far from being blind, and depends largely on the agenda of a given group/person/administration. But are we surprised, coming from the "most transparent admin" ever?
Is this why Sanders met with Obummer? Is this why Sanders has not conceeded the race yet?
Could we be seeing a Sanders-Warren ticket? Hmmm...
The chances of her being indicted are about as likely as Trump dropping out. I doubt either will happen. If it does, then will be time to figure this out.
A Sanders-Warren ticket would make more sense that HRC-Warren. However, HRC is not going to drop out even if she is indicted. She will need to be physically removed from office if she is convicted while she is President (if she wins).
If she is indicted it is over for her; I think most would feel that way. If she did step down, look for Biden to come running as fast as his old legs will let him. He would be the best shot: Overall people are not going to support a true socialist and there are those on the right that would simply say: oh so what; he would be sorta like Ford, just a figure head for 4 years. How much damage would he really do?
So you are saying if the FBI recommends indicted and Lynch decides not to prosecute for political reasons, you are ok with that? You would be fine with a President that the FBI believes they have enough evidence to convict criminal charges on? Criminal charges on acts that could have or did put our country at risk for personal gain? That would be ok with you?
I thought justice was blind. Didnt matter who you were, if you commit a crime, you have to face justice.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.