Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-13-2016, 10:59 AM
 
9,727 posts, read 9,728,101 times
Reputation: 6407

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
No, it's just that the email stuff was never a game changer and the Republicans have drawn it out so long that people simply have tuned them out.

Exposing proof that the Clintons were selling government access and action and enriching themselves in addition to mishandling classified information is not a game changer?????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-13-2016, 11:01 AM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 27 days ago)
 
27,646 posts, read 16,129,622 times
Reputation: 19065
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
That tells me that the Democrats would vote for Adolf Hitler if he had a (D) after his name.
Exhibit A:
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~
No one cares honestly. The GOP loves it but their base was never voting for her anyway.
Case closed!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 11:39 AM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,096,148 times
Reputation: 6135
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
Exposing proof that the Clintons were selling government access and action and enriching themselves in addition to mishandling classified information is not a game changer?????
This kind of corruption is standard practice for the Clintons, so no, it's not a game changer.

Hillary exclusively used a private email, and server while in the senate. Because congress exempt themselves from the FOIA, we'll never know how many classified emails Hillary sent and received as a senator with her unsecure communications. Hillary has been jeopardizing national security the entire time she worked for the government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 12:53 PM
 
2,540 posts, read 2,755,972 times
Reputation: 3891
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
We know obamas admin will not touch her.. its up to the people.. Dont give this crook a vote of confidence
Oh sure, let's instead elect an orange-skinned reality tv star with no political experience whatsoever to the most powerful office in the world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 01:02 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 27 days ago)
 
27,646 posts, read 16,129,622 times
Reputation: 19065
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanCrossroads View Post
Oh sure, let's instead elect an orange-skinned reality tv star with no political experience whatsoever to the most powerful office in the world.
Oh sure, let's instead elect an black-skinned community organizer with no political experience whatsoever to the most powerful office in the world
See what I did there?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 01:10 PM
 
2,540 posts, read 2,755,972 times
Reputation: 3891
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
Oh sure, let's instead elect an black-skinned community organizer with no political experience whatsoever to the most powerful office in the world
See what I did there?
How wrong you are. He was a senator, and prior to that a state senator. He also taught constitutional law. Meanwhile, does Trump even know how to spell the word "constitutional"?

Just imagine the right-wing outrage if Democrats were the ones who had chosen a reality tv star with no political experience as their presumptive nominee. The usual conservative pundits and talking heads would be having a field day with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 01:11 PM
 
4,660 posts, read 4,120,087 times
Reputation: 9012
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
No, it's just that the email stuff was never a game changer and the Republicans have drawn it out so long that people simply have tuned them out.
Actually, the scandal dragged Hillary's numbers down to mortal levels. I still predict that she will win, but this has erroded her and support and there is no doubt about that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 01:23 PM
 
Location: New York
2,251 posts, read 4,915,577 times
Reputation: 1617
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
Turn out the lights ♫ the party's over:
WikiLeaks to publish more Hillary Clinton emails - Julian Assange | Media | The Guardian

Assange is no fan of Clinton

..Highly unlikely that the US attorney general, Loretta Lynch, would indict Clinton. “She’s not going to indict Hillary Clinton, that’s not possible. It’s not going to happen. But the FBI can push for concessions from a Clinton government,” he said.....

FBI can push for concessions - WHAT CONCESSIONS, BY SENDING HER TO JAIL?

Hillary broke the law, and now they are talking about concessions. Any one else would of been in jail. Crooked Hillary serves her name very well!


Trump 2016



.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 01:34 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
No, it's just that the email stuff was never a game changer and the Republicans have drawn it out so long that people simply have tuned them out.
Hillary is to blame for this going on so long, she's stonewalled this since it started.

FYI it's the FBI that is investigating her for the last nine months and we would should have the results in short time. The longer they take the worse it's looking for her, it's very likely the scope of this investigation has expanded beyond the emails themselves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-13-2016, 01:37 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanCrossroads View Post
How wrong you are. He was a senator, and prior to that a state senator. He also taught constitutional law. Meanwhile, does Trump even know how to spell the word "constitutional"?

Just imagine the right-wing outrage if Democrats were the ones who had chosen a reality tv star with no political experience as their presumptive nominee. The usual conservative pundits and talking heads would be having a field day with that.
I've noticed the media referring to him as reality TV star too, billionaire real estate developer and business tycoon paints too good a picture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:32 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top