Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:43 AM
 
Location: United States
12,390 posts, read 7,044,733 times
Reputation: 6134

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petty Pendergrass View Post
Yeah...crazy that the GOP blew the one chance they had to run with a candidate who could actually win.

Trump makes an FBI investigation against his opponent look like a molehill compared to the mountain of crap he brings with his campaign.

...and espionage is a pretty strong word. You'll find sailors and soldiers committing espionage everyday by your definition. Every time an email is forwarded home with a possible return from deployment date, or printed off at home despite its classification, I guess that's espionage? I can tell you as a veteran that in the email era, the only people who you can be sure have not compromised information in some way, are the IT guys...and even they have slipped up on occasion.

The more you all reach with this stuff, the further Hillary pulls ahead.

So...please, continue. Lol
That is absurd.

Hillary had 2200 classified emails, including 22 emails with top secret information on her private server. Also remember that Hillary turned over less than half of her emails, and deleted the majority of them.

Are you comparing sending an email with a possible return home date to sending thousands out classified emails, including emails that has Special Access Program information (the most secretive government programs) in them?





Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14 View Post
Please cite all these so-called "experts" who are claiming she committed espionage. And no, Mark Levin doesn't count.

There's another thread this morning claiming she had John Ashe murdered. These Clinton conspiracy nuts know no bounds. It's a thriving cottage industry, fueled by the likes of Mark Levin. But the good news is, people stopped paying attention to them years ago. This is just more of the same.

Espionage. Right.
There is no shortage of experts, no matter which ones I post, you won't like (because you don't like any of them that can show Hillary committed espionage).

You do a quick google search, and find one that you are willing to accept.

Better yet, find a credible legal expert that can go into detail about how Hillary didn't violate the law. They all say the same thing, you can't prove intent (which is very debatable), but it isn't nessary to prove intent with espionage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:48 AM
 
465 posts, read 254,587 times
Reputation: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dbones View Post
Only morally bankrupt ignoramuses would think Trump is worse than Hillary and ignore her complete corruption and illegal doings at the highest levels.
Well, this morally bankrupt ignoramus is going to enjoy laughing at you and the rest of the wing nuts when your head explodes on November 9th.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:48 AM
 
3,637 posts, read 1,681,409 times
Reputation: 5465
I will only be convinced that she did something wrong when Rush Limbaugh says so !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:50 AM
 
18,986 posts, read 8,991,867 times
Reputation: 14688
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
There is no shortage of experts, no matter which ones I post, you won't like (because you don't like any of them that can show Hillary committed espionage).

You do a quick google search, and find one that you are willing to accept.

Better yet, find a credible legal expert that can go into detail about how Hillary didn't violate the law. They all say the same thing, you can't prove intent (which is very debatable), but it isn't nessary to prove intent with espionage.
You made the claim, you back it up. The fact that you can't pretty much tells us all we need to know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:51 AM
 
7,982 posts, read 4,248,273 times
Reputation: 6744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petty Pendergrass View Post
Well, this morally bankrupt ignoramus is going to enjoy laughing at you and the rest of the wing nuts when your head explodes on November 9th.
It could be one of the best parts of my day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:52 AM
 
465 posts, read 254,587 times
Reputation: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
That is absurd.

Hillary had 2200 classified emails, including 22 emails with top secret information on her private server.

Are you comparing sending an email with a possible return home date to sending thousands out classified emails, including emails that has Special Access Program information (the most secretive government programs) in them?



Yes, because those emails, as well as most official emails within military installations or among high ranking officials, are quite often classified as "Secret". I don't excuse her at all, but unless she sent nuclear launch codes or something, what she is accused of isn't all that uncommon or unheard of for those of us who ACTUALLY KNOW how classified emails are often handled.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:52 AM
NCN
 
Location: NC/SC Border Patrol
21,661 posts, read 25,497,207 times
Reputation: 24343
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
Yes, people always talk about there being no smoking gun evidence, well, in this case, there is.

Hillary also shared top secret drone strike information with someone outside the government, and without a security clearance. That is also in violation of the Espionage Act.

The amount of evidence publicly available makes it impossible for the DOJ not indict.
Democrats are exempt from American laws. If you don't believe that watch the president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:54 AM
 
13,899 posts, read 6,392,259 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petty Pendergrass View Post
Yes, because those emails, as well as most official emails within military installations or among high ranking officials, are quite often classified as "Secret". I don't excuse her at all, but unless she sent nuclear launch codes or something, what she is accused of isn't all that uncommon or unheard of for those of us who ACTUALLY KNOW how classified emails are often handled.
lmao..You know nothing then. Who handles them on their own unsecured servers in their homes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 09:55 AM
 
13,899 posts, read 6,392,259 times
Reputation: 6960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petty Pendergrass View Post
Well, this morally bankrupt ignoramus is going to enjoy laughing at you and the rest of the wing nuts when your head explodes on November 9th.
Atleast you admit it, that's a start to recovery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2016, 10:01 AM
 
27,539 posts, read 15,948,331 times
Reputation: 18955
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petty Pendergrass View Post
Yeah...crazy that the GOP blew the one chance they had to run with a candidate who could actually win.

Trump makes an FBI investigation against his opponent look like a molehill compared to the mountain of crap he brings with his campaign.

...and espionage is a pretty strong word. You'll find sailors and soldiers committing espionage everyday by your definition. Every time an email is forwarded home with a possible return from deployment date, or printed off at home despite its classification, I guess that's espionage? I can tell you as a veteran that in the email era, the only people who you can be sure have not compromised information in some way, are the IT guys...and even they have slipped up on occasion.

The more you all reach with this stuff, the further Hillary pulls ahead.

So...please, continue. Lol
Where to begin? It would be pointless. When and if the left decides to uphold the law, these posters will go awol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top