Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yeah...crazy that the GOP blew the one chance they had to run with a candidate who could actually win.
Trump makes an FBI investigation against his opponent look like a molehill compared to the mountain of crap he brings with his campaign.
...and espionage is a pretty strong word. You'll find sailors and soldiers committing espionage everyday by your definition. Every time an email is forwarded home with a possible return from deployment date, or printed off at home despite its classification, I guess that's espionage? I can tell you as a veteran that in the email era, the only people who you can be sure have not compromised information in some way, are the IT guys...and even they have slipped up on occasion.
The more you all reach with this stuff, the further Hillary pulls ahead.
So...please, continue. Lol
That is absurd.
Hillary had 2200 classified emails, including 22 emails with top secret information on her private server. Also remember that Hillary turned over less than half of her emails, and deleted the majority of them.
Are you comparing sending an email with a possible return home date to sending thousands out classified emails, including emails that has Special Access Program information (the most secretive government programs) in them?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JAMS14
Please cite all these so-called "experts" who are claiming she committed espionage. And no, Mark Levin doesn't count.
There's another thread this morning claiming she had John Ashe murdered. These Clinton conspiracy nuts know no bounds. It's a thriving cottage industry, fueled by the likes of Mark Levin. But the good news is, people stopped paying attention to them years ago. This is just more of the same.
Espionage. Right.
There is no shortage of experts, no matter which ones I post, you won't like (because you don't like any of them that can show Hillary committed espionage).
You do a quick google search, and find one that you are willing to accept.
Better yet, find a credible legal expert that can go into detail about how Hillary didn't violate the law. They all say the same thing, you can't prove intent (which is very debatable), but it isn't nessary to prove intent with espionage.
There is no shortage of experts, no matter which ones I post, you won't like (because you don't like any of them that can show Hillary committed espionage).
You do a quick google search, and find one that you are willing to accept.
Better yet, find a credible legal expert that can go into detail about how Hillary didn't violate the law. They all say the same thing, you can't prove intent (which is very debatable), but it isn't nessary to prove intent with espionage.
You made the claim, you back it up. The fact that you can't pretty much tells us all we need to know.
Hillary had 2200 classified emails, including 22 emails with top secret information on her private server.
Are you comparing sending an email with a possible return home date to sending thousands out classified emails, including emails that has Special Access Program information (the most secretive government programs) in them?
Yes, because those emails, as well as most official emails within military installations or among high ranking officials, are quite often classified as "Secret". I don't excuse her at all, but unless she sent nuclear launch codes or something, what she is accused of isn't all that uncommon or unheard of for those of us who ACTUALLY KNOW how classified emails are often handled.
Yes, people always talk about there being no smoking gun evidence, well, in this case, there is.
Hillary also shared top secret drone strike information with someone outside the government, and without a security clearance. That is also in violation of the Espionage Act.
The amount of evidence publicly available makes it impossible for the DOJ not indict.
Democrats are exempt from American laws. If you don't believe that watch the president.
Yes, because those emails, as well as most official emails within military installations or among high ranking officials, are quite often classified as "Secret". I don't excuse her at all, but unless she sent nuclear launch codes or something, what she is accused of isn't all that uncommon or unheard of for those of us who ACTUALLY KNOW how classified emails are often handled.
lmao..You know nothing then. Who handles them on their own unsecured servers in their homes?
Yeah...crazy that the GOP blew the one chance they had to run with a candidate who could actually win.
Trump makes an FBI investigation against his opponent look like a molehill compared to the mountain of crap he brings with his campaign.
...and espionage is a pretty strong word. You'll find sailors and soldiers committing espionage everyday by your definition. Every time an email is forwarded home with a possible return from deployment date, or printed off at home despite its classification, I guess that's espionage? I can tell you as a veteran that in the email era, the only people who you can be sure have not compromised information in some way, are the IT guys...and even they have slipped up on occasion.
The more you all reach with this stuff, the further Hillary pulls ahead.
So...please, continue. Lol
Where to begin? It would be pointless. When and if the left decides to uphold the law, these posters will go awol
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.