Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wouldn't people with integrity make a stand about public officials saying 100's of lies?
And Iraq had nothing to do with Sept 11, and GW Bush attacked Iraq in the name of Sept 11. America killed 100,000+ innocent Iraqi people in the Iraq war, and did the republicans ever complain? NO
Wouldn't people with integrity complain about 100,000+ innocent people being killed?
Wouldn't people with integrity complain about the above actions?
But republicans ignore and hide the above outrageous acts, and then protect and support the political party that did them. Then republicans turn around and form armies against Hillary (for trivial events), while they hide and cover-up 100's of republican lies and 100,000+ innocent dead people.
You speak of republican integrity (you mean insane f.ing evil.)
Wouldn't people with integrity make a stand about public officials saying 100's of lies?
And Iraq had nothing to do with Sept 11, and GW Bush attacked Iraq in the name of Sept 11. America killed 100,000+ innocent Iraqi people in the Iraq war, and did the republicans ever complain? NO
Wouldn't people with integrity complain about 100,000+ innocent people being killed?
Wouldn't people with integrity complain about the above actions?
But republicans ignore and hide the above outrageous acts, and then protect and support the political party that did them. Then republicans turn around and form armies against Hillary (for trivial events), while they hide and cover-up 100's of republican lies and 100,000+ innocent dead people.
You speak of republican integrity (you mean insane f.ing evil.)
oh, and the famous pro hil/herd argument comes up once again.....comparing bad behavior to bad behavior to justify supporting someone corrupt/their "team".
Here it is once again people, on full display.....the type of mentality that gets us the same corrupt/bought off set in year after year, decade after decade, with the infamous bizarre rationalization....."your person/team is just a little more corrupt than mine, therefore I'm good/ok/safe with my supporting a corrupt/bought off/chronic lying/I'm above the law person."
oh, and the famous pro hil/herd argument comes up once again.....comparing bad behavior to bad behavior to justify supporting someone corrupt.
Here it is once again people, on full display.....the type of mentality that gets us the same corrupt/bought off set in year after year, decade after decade, with the infamous bizarre rationalization....."your person/team is just a little more corrupt than mine!, therefore I'm good with my supporting a corrupt/bought off/chronic lying/I'm above the law person."
Amazing....
It is republicans covering up 100's of lies and 100,000+ innocent dead people, and then instantly turning around and attacking Hillary like a pack of animals for Benghazi and (accusations) of lies and 15 dead people.
(when possibly the whole thing was 100% out of Hillary's control.)
Wouldn't people with integrity make a stand about public officials saying 100's of lies?
And Iraq had nothing to do with Sept 11, and GW Bush attacked Iraq in the name of Sept 11. America killed 100,000+ innocent Iraqi people in the Iraq war, and did the republicans ever complain? NO
Wouldn't people with integrity complain about 100,000+ innocent people being killed?
Wouldn't people with integrity complain about the above actions?
But republicans ignore and hide the above outrageous acts, and then protect and support the political party that did them. Then republicans turn around and form armies against Hillary (for trivial events), while they hide and cover-up 100's of republican lies and 100,000+ innocent dead people.
You speak of republican integrity (you mean insane f.ing evil.)
Bush and Cheney aren't running. They haven't been in power for seven years. Why are left wingers mired in the past?
Bush and Cheney aren't running. They haven't been in power for seven years. Why are left wingers mired in the past?
I guess your correct and I should stop talking about Iraq, and I guess republicans are also correct about not talking about GW Bush. And perhaps liberals should stop talking about anything that happened before Obama took office.
People say things like “Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.”
But clearly republicans are correct and they are wrong.
Well, to be fair, it wasn't really a public "known" that she was blatantly lying about very serious matters until Comey made his announcement.
Maybe I'm judging too early since Comey's announcement is so fresh; however, since I've read and heard so many Democrats call this a "victory" for her, I just don't see any real change. Anybody who looked at this remotely in an objective manner has known that she was most likely lying in at least some of her statements prior to the facts we know now.
If you look at the Benghazi threads here on CD, you'll find very little participation from me that is mostly limited to valid criticism about requests for more security being denied, which is well documented.
If she directly and knowingly lied about these matters of national security, how can anybody accept her word on Benghazi?
Democrats, do the right thing and push for another candidate before the convention. Heck, there might even be a small chance I might vote for a moderate Democratic candidate over Trump.
I have seen many Democrat pundits even admitting this is really bad. Than they go on to say they will vote for her. Sorry but how can this woman be a President that you have respect for.
My kids need a President we can say that even though you may not agree you have at least respect for the President. Both my kids can vote and our daughter is very clear that she doesn't respect a liar and at the same time isn't a big fan of Trump but she will vote for him based on his immigration, economic, health care plan.
As immigrants we went through the legal system and want others to do the same and not by a President risking everyone's life and with a pen he or she can decide what the entire country has to live with.
This is suppose to be a democracy where two parties vote and decide and not a dictator.
I love the "Bush did 'this' ...." argument. It's a diversion to avoid the issue. If we play that game where you say Bush, I say Clinton, you say Bush/Reagan, I say Carter. It has no bearing on dealing with the problems the country faces now.
How about a President or nominee that we can respect if not agree with? That would qualify for a security clearance if they applied for a job at one of the 3-letter agencies?
I am not saying Trump is the answer. He is only an alternative, and it's sad for this country that he is the ONLY alternative.
What I can't understand is how so many Democrats will continue to support her when she directly lied to the country about matters of national security.
No indictment, no criminal charges. I'm done and satisfied. Sorry.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
