Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-24-2016, 05:49 AM
 
Location: U.S.
9,510 posts, read 9,087,690 times
Reputation: 5927

Advertisements

Even Yahoo news is running the AP story that slams Hillary for her foreign donations and meeting primarily with those donors that donated over $1,000,000.

The state department said they don't know of a single incident or meeting that influenced Hillary's actions to help those donors!?! Despite the calendar showing over 50% off Hillary's schedule was WITH foreign donors.

Despite the emails that the state department released, they are still in denial. Well the media is finally waking on this one and it's front page news in every national newspaper.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/many-dono...-election.html

http://nypost.com/2016/08/23/new-rev...llary-clinton/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:04 AM
 
6,617 posts, read 5,008,926 times
Reputation: 3689
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsonkk View Post
Even Yahoo news is running the AP story that slams Hillary for her foreign donations and meeting primarily with those donors that donated over $1,000,000.

The state department said they don't know of a single incident or meeting that influenced Hillary's actions to help those donors!?! Despite the calendar showing over 50% off Hillary's schedule was WITH foreign donors.

Despite the emails that the state department released, they are still in denial. Well the media is finally waking on this one and it's front page news in every national newspaper.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/many-dono...-election.html
Calendars shows that she had contact with 50% of her donors not that 50% of her meetings were with donors huge distinction. Most of contact was in form of phone calls, there is nothing to the current story clearly secretary Clinton could have had phone calls with donors to talk about the donations, she could have met with donors in a personal capacity not as SOS. This very simple you have the list of donors and donations, you have time stamps of when the meetings, phone calls took place, now match donors with their interest and show me specific actions that the state department took to further those interest that werent a net positive for the state, out of those 100+ donations there has to be a smoking gun out there other than Sec Clinton took some meetings/phone calls. Let me also comment on the irony of a GOP controlled Congress conducting a witch hunt to find proof of "pay to play" when lobbying is in essence a pay to play system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:24 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,199,011 times
Reputation: 17209
The (D)'s are clearly having large regrets .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Kansas
25,962 posts, read 22,120,062 times
Reputation: 26697
What has come out on Hillary at this point is just so overwhelming that many have turned away from her. By continuing to downplay such unethical behavior and behavior that threatened the security of our nation, it makes them look like "partners in crime" with her and people will lose respect for the media outlets that continue on the path with Clinton.

I mean, geesh, there comes a point when you simply have no grounds to defend someone and Hillary is there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:26 AM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,879,282 times
Reputation: 9117
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
The (D)'s are clearly having large regrets .
No they're not. They will make excuses and complain that it is all part of the conspiracy to make Saint Hillary look bad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:27 AM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,953,334 times
Reputation: 7458
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962 View Post
No they're not. They will make excuses and complain that it is all part of the conspiracy to make Saint Hillary look bad.
Yup. American leftists don't care about anything except power. Hillary is their ticket to more power, which means more cronyism, corruption, graft, and government benefits.

Romney was right about the 47%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:32 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20882
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnywhereElse View Post
What has come out on Hillary at this point is just so overwhelming that many have turned away from her. By continuing to downplay such unethical behavior and behavior that threatened the security of our nation, it makes them look like "partners in crime" with her and people will lose respect for the media outlets that continue on the path with Clinton.

I mean, geesh, there comes a point when you simply have no grounds to defend someone and Hillary is there.

True-

The democrat voters who support her are essentially supporting and condoning wholesale corruption and disregard for the rule of law.

As liberals clearly believe that thier politicians are above the law, they reveal that they embrace "gangster politics" and totalitarian rule.

The rule is law is the "glue" that holds society together. When the rule of law is ignored by politicians, citizens lose faith in those "rules" and faith in the concept. Systemic corruption and lack of adherence to the laws of society result. This is why Nixon HAD TO BE PROSECUTED, and why HILLARY SHOULD BE PROSECUTED.

Restore the faith of the public in the laws of the land- prosecute Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:32 AM
 
3,841 posts, read 1,978,664 times
Reputation: 1906
Calm down everyone, Hillary was a crooked Secretary of State, however, she will not be a crooked President! She already said she will stop foreign donations if she is elected. Forget the fact that she promised congress she would do the same before becoming SOS. Trust her, she is honest NOW. **eyes roll**
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:37 AM
 
Location: West Michigan
12,372 posts, read 9,312,855 times
Reputation: 7364
There is zero, no evidence that any State Department action was influenced by a donation to the Clinton Foundation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-24-2016, 06:41 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20882
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayland Woman View Post
There is zero, no evidence that any State Department action was influenced by a donation to the Clinton Foundation.

.......................... and Keith Richards NEVER used an illegal drug!:sm ack:

The rationalizations of liberals are beyond belief.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top