Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-08-2016, 08:47 AM
 
Location: Jamestown, NY
7,840 posts, read 9,140,847 times
Reputation: 13779

Advertisements

How badly does Trump want to get beat in the popular vote in November? Worse than Barry Goldwater in 1964 (the record holder) I'll bet. Then, he'll at least be the "winner" as the biggest presidential loser.

Go for it, Buffoonanator!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-08-2016, 08:55 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,209,576 times
Reputation: 5565
Sure, then Hillary could just pick Bill and drop the facade .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2016, 08:59 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,209,576 times
Reputation: 5565
All joking aside, that likely would hurt him if he did it. He would have to spend the rest of the campaign fighting off the complaints of nepotism.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2016, 09:04 AM
 
34,300 posts, read 15,517,048 times
Reputation: 13053
Quote:
Originally Posted by ~HecateWhisperCat~ View Post
All joking aside, that likely would hurt him if he did it. He would have to spend the rest of the campaign fighting off the complaints of nepotism.
But not one mention of nepotism when crooked Hillary wants to put Bill in charge of the economy or any other government position. The hypocrisy of liberal thought is outing itself daily in so many comments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2016, 09:17 AM
 
27,539 posts, read 15,944,799 times
Reputation: 18955
vs Cankles the incompetent clown? Any day!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2016, 10:05 AM
 
32,516 posts, read 36,991,174 times
Reputation: 32571
No. Because I know next to nothing about her. I know she was on a reality TV show. (Not impressive. So are the Kardashians.) And I know she's Jewish because every time her father is accused of being anti-Semitic he says, "My daughter is Jewish!" (As if that affects how he feels about every other Jew.)

Being born into a wealthy family, having every advantage handed to you and having "Trump" as a last name qualifies no one to be POTUS or VP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2016, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,070 posts, read 6,918,428 times
Reputation: 5654
No because her name doesn't sound American. Rumor has it she is an anchor baby who does not hold our traditional christian values
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2016, 10:51 AM
 
26,543 posts, read 14,331,871 times
Reputation: 7401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Petty Pendergrass View Post
If she was eligible, I might.
she would be. she makes the age requirement with just 9 days to spare.

Quote:
She seems even-tempered ....
that i will give her ( and puts her light-years ahead of her father IMO ). i did find it funny tho that both her proponents in the article ( corker and eric ) listed her beauty as one of the top reasons she'd make a good VP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2016, 10:53 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,209,576 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by phma View Post
But not one mention of nepotism when crooked Hillary wants to put Bill in charge of the economy or any other government position. The hypocrisy of liberal thought is outing itself daily in so many comments.
All spouses usually have influence within the administration to one degree or another. That's not really anything else. There is a difference between using their advice and placing them into a position of power. Perception is the key.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-08-2016, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Jamestown, NY
7,840 posts, read 9,140,847 times
Reputation: 13779
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
that i will give her ( and puts her light-years ahead of her father IMO ). i did find it funny tho that both her proponents in the article ( corker and eric ) listed her beauty as one of the top reasons she'd make a good VP.
Just another classic example of GOP cluelessness, and why it's looking like the gender gap this cycle may set a record. Apparently Corker and Eric think a younger, smarter, classier version of Sarah Palin (it would be hard for her to be less so) would somehow attract voters, no matter that she is even less qualified than Palin and her only claim to fame is her father ... that despite the fact that the Palin nomination probably contributed significantly to McCain's loss. It's a testament to exactly what Trump and his campaign staff think of the American voters in general, and Trump supporters in particular.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top