BREAKING: US Attorney General asked to investigate Clinton for perjury (democrat, liberals)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
WHO has been prosecuted for doing what Clinton did?
Give me a name.
According to the FBI director NO ONE has EVER been prosecuted for that crime - not in the 99 years the law has been in effect.
If the FBI director is wrong, tell me WHO's been prosecuted for that crime.
Ken
They keep arguing with you because they don't like that answer.
No one has ever been prosecuted for what Clinton did.
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer— Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Extreme Carelessness or Gross Negligence.... we can argue the semantics or the legal defintion but there is razor thin difference between the two.
Yes they have, the only difference between this Navy officer and Clinton is he admitted it.
I'm going to have to make a correction here as there is actually a huge difference. The NAVY officer doesn't have the high profile status of Clinton making him a huge target nor was he storing that information on an easily identifiable server open to hacking attempts 24/7/365 nor was he accessing it with Blackberry after being repeatedly warned about the security implications.
You seem to say a lot of things, and then say that isn't what you said.
There's no shortage of graduates of the Clinton school for parsing, lies and double speak everywhere. You know, folks that write stuff, and then say that isn't what they meant when they wrote that. The average guy on the street is beginning to recognize them when they see them.
CN
DETAILS and SPECIFICS MATTER
Now maybe that's a bit to complicated for you, but it's a FACT - especially in LAW,
Republicans are always spending taxpayers money on something. They make the debts then blame the Democrats. Wonder what fiasco is going down when they have the Republican convention?
Ken the Navy guy I referenced did not have intent either. He admitted to wrongdoing. He's not a lawyer surrounded by an army of lawyers though. There is other examples of cases like his.
And you know that HOW exactly?
From what I understand, Nishimura DELIBERATELY downloaded classified info to his own devices. There's no evidence Clinton did that. As I said earlier, INTENT is key.
Not only that, but according to the FBI article, Nishimura took that device OFF BASE when serving in AFGHANISTAN!!!!!!!!!!!
"...Nishimura, however, caused the materials to be downloaded and stored on his personal, unclassified electronic devices and storage media. He carried such classified materials on his unauthorized media when he traveled off-base in Afghanistan ..."
Finally Nishimura is the ONE WHO DOWNLOADED the classified info. Clinton never did that. She simple received e-mails SENT BY OTHER PEOPLE. E-Mails that were NOT PROPERLY MARKED so there is no way to know/prove that she KNEW she was looking at classified info. She is NOT the ONE WHO REMOVED the classified info from the classified machines.
Again, INTENT is KEY.
Ken
Last edited by LordBalfor; 07-12-2016 at 07:18 AM..
The Clinton defenders have really embarrassed themselves on this thread. Wisely, only a few showed up to expose themselves.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.