'Her mind is shot': Donald Trump-Ruth Bader Ginsburg feud goes nuclear (illegal, extremist)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yeah, just have president Trump and his children handle the whole government. Great idea Trumpettes.
With comments like the ones in bold I think you helped Hillary win more supporters. You don't want a government, you want a dictatorship.
We have never been closer to a dictatorship than we are right now under Obama and crooked Hillary will continue that, as she has stated. So it's difficult to understand the objection.
I think its safe to say she needs to go, I am not a Trump supporter either, but add this on to her falling asleep at the State of the Union, then blaming it on drinking beforehand I think it calls her cognitive abilities and judgement into question.
Ginsburg needs to GO!!!! I say that, and I won't be voting for Trump this election.
This is not appropriate behavior for a Supreme Court justice, let alone one that has served for many years as one.
I disagree that Justice Ginsburg has to 'go'. However, should an issue involving Mr. Trump arise (like Gore v. Bush), then she must obviously recuse herself from the case* However, she may still hear plenty of non-Trump cases. Otherwise, simply saying that she believes Mr. Trump is 'fake' is not a grounds for Constitutional impeachment.
*obvious to me. However, there is no firm and fast rule on when a judge, or justice, must recuse themselves.
She is correct is everything she said about Trump. She is a very intelligent person. She knew how to push Trump's button and she knew he would reply to her comments.
Anyone can get Trump to go into a tirade - just disparage him. It's an easy way to sidetrack him from important issues and get him off of the message he needs to be focusing on.
Ginsburg needs to GO!!!! I say that, and I won't be voting for Trump this election.
This is not appropriate behavior for a Supreme Court justice, let alone one that has served for many years as one.
There is nothing in the Constitution that prevents a Supreme Court Justice from using his or her first amendment rights. In fact there was a sitting Justice who once ran for president. Charles Hughes, was a Republican presidential candidate in 1916. A comment like Ginsburg made would, however, make it necessary for her recuse herself from ruling on a case involving Trump, nothing more.
Yeah, just have president Trump and his children handle the whole government. Great idea Trumpettes.
With comments like the ones in bold I think you helped Hillary win more supporters. You don't want a government, you want a dictatorship.
Haha. I think you overestimate the impact of our little CD Politics and Other Controversies bubble.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.