Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sorry but brainwashed is repeating the same nonsense that was already addressed in this forum over and over including in this thread. The Clinton Foundation is not structured to collect money and dole it out in grants. Claiming that they don't give out much in grants as something nefarious is admitting your ignorance.
Once again, **********s think if they repeat something often enough it magically transforms from false to true. It only works that way in a ********** brain, because they accept whatever Donnie has said most recently as the truth even when he directly contradicts something he said a minute earlier.
I post facts/data. If that's "brainwashed" and "nonsense" to you, you're entitled to live in your own reality of course.
And talk about posting the same old "nonsense" over and over again.....
It's the general concept you're missing once again, ie using money for purposes other than what it's suppose to be used for. It's relevant to the topic at hand that you brought up in the OP.
But yes, politics is constantly about never ending lies/sleaziness in my view. I see it in all stripes with ALL politicians. You apparently can't, defend your queen with a cult like relevance when she does such things. I stand in bewilderment how so many are brainwashed and can defend such a person, especially clinton, accuse side "A" of being "brainwashed", yet they practice the same behavior. All very amusing until you realize such people vote.
I post facts/data. If that's "brainwashed" and "nonsense" to you, you're entitled to live in your own reality of course.
And talk about posting the same old "nonsense" over and over again.....
It's the general concept you're missing once again, ie using money for purposes other than what it's suppose to be used for. It's relevant to the topic at hand that you brought up in the OP.
But yes, politics is constantly about never ending lies/sleaziness in my view. I see it in all stripes with ALL politicians. You apparently can't, defend your queen with a cult like relevance when she does such things. I stand in bewilderment how so many are brainwashed and can defend such a person, especially clinton, accuse side "A" of being "brainwashed", yet they practice the same behavior. All very amusing until you realize such people vote.
By posting the facts you just confused most of the liberal voters.
Funny how liberals will say that Trumps an ego maniac and a control freak and only wants what's best for him but one only needs to look at Hillary for that description! This woman could care less about any of the little pion voters,she's going to continue to take care of her big wig wall street execs and friends in the DOJ. These two have lied,cheated and stole their way to riches (remember she claims they left the white house broke) and soon enough they will go down! She's a despicable human being and it amazes me how anyone with any morals or ethics could vote for this shrew. I'll say it once again that Trumps is not my first choice but given the two choices he's 1,000 times better than this evil witch who's only intensions are to run this country into the ground.
Why don't you provide a single shred of evidence of this oft-repeated claim? Oh, that's right, you can't. And it doesn't magically turn true no matter how many times you say it.
What IS true though IS that she claims to be a champion for LGBT/LGBT rights/etc. yet took donations for said (her) foundation from countries where many of the leaders and and citizens think those who are LGBT should be thrown off of the roofs of buildings.
Just keep digging until you find he got a lot of people killed in Benghazi, his wife blew interns in the governors mansion, and he dodged prison after exposing confidential information, and then try again.
To be fair, I do think its a valid complaint to take campaign funds, to pay a mortgage.. but yeah, given the alternative, it doesnt matter in the end..
Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from her private e-mail server very likely had references to the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a conflict of interest.
The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be
the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history. This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.
Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this case, the Clinton's set it up in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did -- contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result -- foreign money goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering. Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted. As an aside, imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
Why did these foreign interests funnel money through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need ???
This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling.
Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest and criminal, and they are Slick !
Warning: They could be back in the White House in January 2017.
Don't let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. You must inform and educate them !!!
LOL. Krauthammer 'alluded'.
Your description sounds like the fake company Trump set up.
Surely Hillary's VP pick will be better than Pence.
Pence is an awful pick for Trump. Most news stories are saying that Trump screwed up by picking Pence. Even the conservative leaning organizations don't think Pence is a good choice.
It looks like Trump can't stand Pence. Trump probably runs away from Pence as soon as the cameras are off. On no, he runs away from him even when the cameras are still ON.
"The body language between them was sort of stiff and awkward. And then when Trump sort of handed off the podium to him but didn't stand there with him,..."
Even trump doesn't think Penice is a good choice. He even tried to change it.
We don't really need evidence. We have destroyed her by innuendo. Check out her approval numbers; I think you are the only person left in America who approves of her. Well, you and your sister.
We learned that tactic from Hillary and Harry Reid. We had never really thought about it before Hillary destroyed the women Bill had affairs with, and Reid suggested that Romney had paid no taxes in years.
I included the part of the story in my original post saying it wasn't illegal at the time. But I personally find it important as it's evidence of character, or lack thereof.
You support Hillary, yet claim to care about character. That's rich.
Quote:
most of the claims that have been made about Hillary are BS
Curious, a thread on Pence and how he used his mortgage becomes a dumping ground for an email that began being circulated in 2015. By the way, neither Charles Krauthammer nor Dave Hollenbeck, the other alleged author were willing to accept responsibility for it. The origins appear to come from an American Thinker blog post. Like so much of the tripe from the right, no one wants to take ownership, they just want to pass it off as gospel.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.