Hillary - Castro 2016 (vote, illegal, Brown, Barack Obama)

[marino760]

Originally Posted by gsoboi78

Here is an article listing reasons why Hillary would pick Castro. And yes Hillary has a shot at winning Texas. You forget she is running against Donald Trump who is doing lousy in Texas despite his narrow lead in the polls in Texas

http://www.bustle.com/articles/16813...inal-shortlist

The latest average polling data for TX has Trump leading by 7. Hardly a narrow race, and that number will probably become higher this week.

[Natural510]

Originally Posted by gsoboi78

Here is an article listing reasons why Hillary would pick Castro. And yes Hillary has a shot at winning Texas. You forget she is running against Donald Trump who is doing lousy in Texas despite his narrow lead in the polls in Texas

http://www.bustle.com/articles/16813...inal-shortlist

So basically, he is young, Latino and from Texas. Nothing about any of his actual merits to a heartbeat away from the Oval Office.

[freemkt]

Originally Posted by PCALMike

Not a word about what he actually stands for and his record though.

He is a Wall Street democrat through and through. Far from a progressive. He doesnt represent the workers in any way.

Picking a VP based on the person's skin color and his silver tongue is a terrible idea. And no, Texas wont go to Hillary!

I presume that with Hillary he will escalate HUD's war on affluent suburbs and being Westchester-style conflict to the rest of the country.

[gsoboi78]

Originally Posted by Natural510

So basically, he is young, Latino and from Texas. Nothing about any of his actual merits to a heartbeat away from the Oval Office.

Than why support Trump? Castro has more government experience than Trump and Trump is running for the highest office in the land, not the VP.

[Colt .45]

Originally Posted by gsoboi78

Than why support Trump? Castro has more government experience than Trump and Trump is running for the highest office in the land, not the VP.

Exactly, the inexperience angle wont work......Trump has NO experience, balanced with an Experienced Pence for VP........Clinton Castro would be a POTUS with Experience, and a VP with minimal experience, seems to favor us, or even at best....minimal experience and having a "bad" name didnt stop BO from being elected....

[Ponderosa]

If you want a Hispanic with an anti-wall street rep, Tom Perez is a better choice. He is a bulldog on worker rights and has been a thorn in the side of business for time. That might be a disadvantage, though.

[PCALMike]

Originally Posted by Ponderosa

If you want a Hispanic with an anti-wall street rep, Tom Perez is a better choice. He is a bulldog on worker rights and has been a thorn in the side of business for time. That might be a disadvantage, though.

Tom Perez is a very good choice.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alnOJxnBkj4

[Grumpy ol' Man]

Originally Posted by gsoboi78

I wouldn't worry too much about names. After all America elected a man named Barack Hussein Obama. Remember Saddam Hussein and Obama is very close to the name of Osama.

and they both share the same idealism, destroy America...

[mohawkx]

Originally Posted by Grumpy ol' Man

and they both share the same idealism, destroy America...

Nah! Not at all. They just want to give all Grumpy Old Men a monthly SS check, a hot meal on wheels if they need it, and the best medical coverage available.
You are aware that There are people who would like to take that all away?

[tangelag]

Originally Posted by gsoboi78

Than why support Trump? Castro has more government experience than Trump and Trump is running for the highest office in the land, not the VP.

Bingo!