Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you were "paying off" someone for doing something illegal or immoral or just plane suspect during an election, wouldn't you wait till the election was over to transfer the money so as NOT to be caught?
If people are going to come up with conspiracy theories, they should at least make some sense.
Not for nothing, Snopes is claiming this is Unproven...not false.
And where there's smoke...
Especially with the Clinton Foundation.
It's hard to prove a negative so sure, it's possible that the Clinton Foundation is randomly sending $375K to some law firm who name changes between various versions of the so-called evidence, located in a city where the alleged recipient doesn't even life.
It's also possible that they just sent me a million dollars for all my hard work posting here on C-D and it's just not showing up in my bank account yet.
It's also possible that they just sent me a million dollars for all my hard work posting here on C-D and it's just not showing up in my bank account yet.
The document was forged. The forger was so careless that the name of the law firm was spelled wrong.
When people started pointing out the mis-spelling, the forger uploaded an updated forgery. But was so careless that the updated forgery contained a new mis-spelling. (Shaking head)
These are fracking idiots who couldn't forge a text document without making a mess!! Idiots trying to trick other idiots.
The fact that right-winger HAVE TO LIE in order to attack Khan and Hillary tells you a lot. Without lies, they have nothing. Nada.
.
It was not proven FALSE. It was UNPROVEN. There is a difference. If Hillary didn't have the reputation that she has earned, there would never have been a question. She is so widely known for deceit and it is her own fault. We all know there was something in this for Khan as an immigration lawyer bringing in fellow Muslims under a "pay to play" scheme.
It was not proven FALSE. It was UNPROVEN. There is a difference. If Hillary didn't have the reputation that she has earned, there would never have been a question. She is so widely known for deceit and it is her own fault. We all know there was something in this for Khan as an immigration lawyer bringing in fellow Muslims under a "pay to play" scheme.
And pray tell, exactly how would someone prove a negative?
We do know that the supposed evidence proving it was completely bogus and clearly falsified with the name magically changed multiple times. I'm sure the real evidence is somewhere with Obama's Kenyan birth certificate, right?
The OP should be embarrassed for posting this nonsense.
Yes the lawyer giving out constitutions is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, your education has failed you.
He's not a lawyer. He pulled down his Website after this controversy broke.
And he doesn't give out copies of the Constitution, either. The copy he held up was purchased for him just hours before, according to sources.
He is a Muslim Brotherhood operative by virtue of his writings and associations. He has written in favor of Sharia Law in the USA.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
