Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-24-2016, 09:40 AM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,273,334 times
Reputation: 5565

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
The state polls were taken at the same time. No reason to me why they would be different unless they really are. In 2012 state polls were more accurate than national ones
Yes, and so were the state polls when Trump was narrowing the national polling. The state polls were not reflecting that fact until a few weeks later. So if these polls become regular then you will see that in the state polling in a week or so.

 
Old 09-24-2016, 11:45 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,795 posts, read 13,249,351 times
Reputation: 19952
The NY Times did an interesting experiment in polling, and it certainly helps to understand why the polls are all over the place. It could make you give up on polls completely.

"We Gave Four Good Pollsters the Same Raw Data. They Had Four Different Results."

"...But in truth, the “margin of sampling error” – basically, the chance that polling different people would have produced a different result – doesn't even come close to capturing the potential for error in surveys.

Polling results rely as much on the judgments of pollsters as on the science of survey methodology. Two good pollsters, both looking at the same underlying data, could come up with two very different results..."

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...lks-about.html
 
Old 09-24-2016, 12:31 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,288,468 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enigma777 View Post
The NY Times did an interesting experiment in polling, and it certainly helps to understand why the polls are all over the place. It could make you give up on polls completely.

"We Gave Four Good Pollsters the Same Raw Data. They Had Four Different Results."

"...But in truth, the “margin of sampling error” – basically, the chance that polling different people would have produced a different result – doesn't even come close to capturing the potential for error in surveys.

Polling results rely as much on the judgments of pollsters as on the science of survey methodology. Two good pollsters, both looking at the same underlying data, could come up with two very different results..."

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...lks-about.html
It all depends on the turnout model they're using. I still think that the most accurate barometers are likely to be the poll aggregators that factor in the average amount of bias by each pollster. That's Nate Silver, Sam Wang and a few others.
 
Old 09-24-2016, 12:39 PM
 
12,547 posts, read 9,926,533 times
Reputation: 6927
538 polls-plus has Trump back above 40%...40.5%. We've came a long way Trumpettes.
 
Old 09-24-2016, 01:20 PM
 
Location: North America
14,204 posts, read 12,273,334 times
Reputation: 5565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
It all depends on the turnout model they're using. I still think that the most accurate barometers are likely to be the poll aggregators that factor in the average amount of bias by each pollster. That's Nate Silver, Sam Wang and a few others.
Basically this is it and the reason why some polls have it better for Trump than others. Some are assuming that Democratic turnout will be depressed and GOP turnout will be high and others don't expect it to be a ton different from 2012. Considering the huge uptick in absentee ballots from Dems I think the latter is more likely then the former. Of course we won't know exactly until election day.
 
Old 09-24-2016, 01:34 PM
 
7,633 posts, read 8,698,013 times
Reputation: 4480
Most or all the polls are popular votes, correct? Are there polls that will transform to the actual GE result via electorate college?
 
Old 09-24-2016, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
25,575 posts, read 56,451,817 times
Reputation: 23368
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmountains View Post
Most or all the polls are popular votes, correct? Are there polls that will transform to the actual GE result via electorate college?
National polls don't segregate by state. State polls - which are done separately - do. Polling aggregators compile the results - a few of which have been discussed in just the last past two pages. Here's one:

http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/#now

And another:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...llege_map.html
 
Old 09-24-2016, 01:46 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,288,468 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by snowmountains View Post
Most or all the polls are popular votes, correct? Are there polls that will transform to the actual GE result via electorate college?
Most poll aggregators take the state returns and calculate what the national electoral vote will look like. Here's a link to a daily update done by the New York Times that gives not only their state by state assessment, but also the findings from 538, Daily Kos, PredictWise, Princeton Election Consortium (Sam Wang), the Cook Political Report, Rothenberg/Gonzales Political Report and Larry Sabato's Crystal Ball.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...cast.html?_r=0

A couple of others to peruse are:

http://pollyvote.com/en/
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/gr...-poll-decoder/
http://www.reuters.com/statesofthenation/
 
Old 09-24-2016, 02:05 PM
 
Location: Caverns measureless to man...
7,588 posts, read 6,622,243 times
Reputation: 17966
Quote:
Originally Posted by eddiehaskell View Post
538 polls-plus has Trump back above 40%...40.5%. We've came a long way Trumpettes.
Not true. Your cultmaster had a brief bump where he was well above 40 for a few days, and now he's slipped back down where he belongs. All 3 of the 538 models have him below 40%.
 
Old 09-24-2016, 04:43 PM
 
52,433 posts, read 26,600,078 times
Reputation: 21097
Looks as if NBC had to pull a fast one to make it look as if Hillary is ahead.

MORE MEDIA LIES=> NBC-WSJ Poll with Hillary Up 6 Points Is Weighted with 14% more Democrat Voters!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top