Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
NAFTA wasn't passed until 1993 way after Reagan and now Hillary wants TPP.
Trump is not an isolationist....he wants fair trade deals for the working class......Reagan would never be for NAFTA or TPP.
Trump allowed for 12 countries to outsource brands of his. Don't tell me he is for the American middle class if he won't create as many jobs as possible. I've watched the Olympics and Hillary debuted an anti-Trump ad with him on Letterman with his Macy's line made in Bangladesh and the 12 countries was cited from FIVE different sources, care to refute?
Trump allowed for 12 countries to outsource brands of his. Don't tell me he is for the American middle class if he won't create as many jobs as possible. I've watched the Olympics and Hillary debuted an anti-Trump ad with him on Letterman with his Macy's line made in Bangladesh and the 12 countries was cited from FIVE different sources, care to refute?
1 ANTI-Trump ad by Hillary Clinton will erase her lousy record on NAFTA and her support for TPP?
Trump has created 22,450 jobs in the U.S.A.....how may has Hillary Clinton created and the Clinton Foundation doesn't count. Will Hillary Clinton put that in her ad?
Will Hillary Clinton put in her add how many millions of dollars she has taken from Wall Street and foreign countries to outsource government contracts and jobs overseas?
you really want to open the can of worms who has sold this country out to the highest bidder between Hillary and Trump? is not even close.
1 ANTI-Trump ad by Hillary Clinton will erase her lousy record on NAFTA and her support for TPP?
Trump has created 22,450 jobs in the U.S.A.....how may has Hillary Clinton created and the Clinton Foundation doesn't count. Will Hillary Clinton put that in her ad?
Will Hillary Clinton put in her add how many millions of dollars she has taken from Wall Street and foreign countries to outsource government contracts and jobs overseas?
you really want to open the can of worms who has sold this country out to the highest bidder between Hillary and Trump? is not even close.
I never talked about TPP. Don't deflect. I agree that is a problem but it is unfair to vote business owners vs politicians for job creation. But the fact remains, Trump has and will sold us out for a nickel as he has done that through outsourcing, H1-b visas and bankruptcies and it is proven. Clinton only MAY do that. Plus isn't Trump also Wall Street and taken from for foreign countries? The main difference is that Hillary isn't a race-baiting bigot. Both are idiots but I rather the one who isn't a race-race-baiter.
I mean how did this really happen, something must have gone really bizzurque to go from that point to what we have here today. I mean did they really elect Trump and how did this really happen??
You should be asking how the dems stooped to this:
No one asked Reagan to cure AIDS. He didn't mention or find any research until it was of epidemic proportions. It's well documented. Read about it. Facts are not liberal or conservative. They just are.
No, he trickled down for the middle class. The deficit grew substantially while wages remained stagnant. Again, this is well documented. Again, your clueless.
Surprisingly, Reagen couldn't be republican today. The party has went totally crazy. You would scream RINO and join orange Hitler in a game of mocking his hair or something else irrelevant. You see, this is what your party now considers intelligence and strength. He called him little, low energy, or crooked. Isn't he tough and presidential? Clueless.
He was behind the curve on it even after an old friend named Rock Hudson announced he had the disease and died. Reagan didn't even do things right and claimed he wanted to test all immigrants and refugees fearing this after the mass-hysteria from politicians like Newt Gingrich wanting to test everyone and put them on a Senator Kelly mutant registry list.
AIDS research funding didn't really happen unitl AFTER Reagan left office in January 1989. Hell, it happened halfway during Bush '41's term after Ryan White, the famous case of a boy getting AIDS through a blood transfusion who was banned from school, died in 1990. Reagan even fear-mongered over White being in the same school as his children.
No one asked Reagan to cure AIDS. He didn't mention or find any research until it was of epidemic proportions. It's well documented. Read about it. Facts are not liberal or conservative. They just are.
No, he trickled down for the middle class. The deficit grew substantially while wages remained stagnant. Again, this is well documented. Again, your clueless.
Surprisingly, Reagen couldn't be republican today. The party has went totally crazy. You would scream RINO and join orange Hitler in a game of mocking his hair or something else irrelevant. You see, this is what your party now considers intelligence and strength. He called him little, low energy, or crooked. Isn't he tough and presidential? Clueless.
1) Vanity Fair??? Richard Lawson, a Hollywood columnist for liberal Hollywood? LMAO!!! What a joke you are! why don't get a columnist from Motor Trend or People Magazine to talk about politics and policies.
2) Federal anti-AIDS spending grew dramatically throughout Reagan’s term. The $8 million that Reagan approved in 1982 rocketed to $2.3 billion in 1989. The average annual increase in federal expenditures on HIV/AIDS under Reagan was 128.92 percent.
3) The deficit has been growing since every PRESIDENT since Reagan. Obama is worse than Reagan in deficit and wages being stagnant. Under Obama the ECONOMY grew 1.5% the lowest since 1949. Economic growth under Reagan average was 3.5% growth.....but here are the democraps and Hillary wanting to continue the same lame policies that has given us the lowest economic growth since 1949.
4) Funny, you can say the same for old schools Democrats like TRUMAN and JFK they would never be accepted in the Democrat party today. They were PRO LIFE Democrats and not extremist lefties like the democrat party of today.....JFK would be labeled anti-women and a republican for his tax cuts and for a big defense proposals.
It all started with Nixon and the shift of the Dixiecrat's to the GOP, slowly the GOP became to represent portions what the Dixiecrats stood with some of the John Birch platform thrown in. The old republican party prior to 1992 was still very concentrated in the NE and had a conservative social slant, but no where near the bat **** crazy born again Christians of today. The NE became more liberalized since 1992 and the power base of the Republican party shifted to Texas, where oil money which had always been present in the party became center stage. If you look at the majority of the John Birchers a lot of them where billionaire oil men. George Bush senior clashed repeatably with this part of his party and refused to yield to them. I highly recommend reading the biography that came out about him, it shows a lot of what the republican party lost. His son became one of them, a born again Christian and used their power to become president. Hopefully we have seen their ilk for the last time, but if history in American tells us anything we will unfortunately have another christian wave again.
He was behind the curve on it even after an old friend named Rock Hudson announced he had the disease and died. Reagan didn't even do things right and claimed he wanted to test all immigrants and refugees fearing this after the mass-hysteria from politicians like Newt Gingrich wanting to test everyone and put them on a Senator Kelly mutant registry list.
AIDS research funding didn't really happen unitl AFTER Reagan left office in January 1989. Hell, it happened halfway during Bush '41's term after Ryan White, the famous case of a boy getting AIDS through a blood transfusion who was banned from school, died in 1990. Reagan even fear-mongered over White being in the same school as his children.
lies!!! you liberals are allergic to the truth, no wonder you support crooked Hillary.
Federal anti-AIDS spending grew dramatically throughout Reagan’s term. The $8 million that Reagan approved in 1982 rocketed to $2.3 billion in 1989. The average annual increase in federal expenditures on HIV/AIDS under Reagan was 128.92 percent.
The highest death rates in the U.S. happened under Bill Clinton in 1996, 41,699 deaths. you clueless democrat!
Originally Posted by Hellion1999;45048592
2) Federal anti-AIDS spending grew dramatically throughout Reagan’s term. The $8 million that Reagan approved in 1982 rocketed to $2.3 billion in 1989. The average annual increase in federal expenditures on HIV/AIDS under Reagan was 128.92 percent.
Reagan's millions were only a fraction of the billions to come from Bush '41's pen when he signed the Ryan White C.A.R.E. Act on August 18, 1990. Reagan's problem was he didn't push hard enough to cure AIDS and instead stuck his head in the sand because it was a largely homosexual and drug user disease rather than the epidemic it was for everyone that it really was.
lies!!! you liberals are allergic to the truth, no wonder you support crooked Hillary.
Federal anti-AIDS spending grew dramatically throughout Reagan’s term. The $8 million that Reagan approved in 1982 rocketed to $2.3 billion in 1989. The average annual increase in federal expenditures on HIV/AIDS under Reagan was 128.92 percent.
The highest death rates in the U.S. happened under Bill Clinton in 1996, 41,699 deaths. you clueless democrat!
As I stated in the post above that 2.3 Billion was from the Ryan White C.A.R.E. was signed in 1990 by Bush NOT Reagan, try again.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
