Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If it makes you Trump supporters feel better, just consider the Secret Service chat with your candidate a move for better protection for all law enforcement officers. After all, it's the SS guys and other LEO's that would be in harms way if some wack job started drinking Trump's kool-aid about ways to resolve political discourse.
"A federal official on Wednesday denied a news report that the U.S. Secret Service had formally spoken with Republican Donald Trump's presidential campaign regarding his suggestion a day earlier that gun rights activists could stop Democratic rival Hillary Clinton from curtailing their access to firearms."
In context for you people. It was totally 100% about the second amendment. The secret service thinks this entire thing is crazy. A former member, who talks to other members, said the same thing. The speculation is ludicrous bordering on maniacal.
That does look better in context, so thank you for posting it. As an aside, Trump really needs a speech writer because it was almost unintelligible to read.
If it makes you Trump supporters feel better, just consider the Secret Service chat with your candidate a move for better protection for all law enforcement officers. After all, it's the SS guys and other LEO's that would be in harms way if some wack job started drinking Trump's kool-aid about ways to resolve political discourse.
There. Feel better?
Only problem with your comment is it's false information to make you feel good. CNN playing you for a fool.
Huh? Nobody cares that Trump just called for the assassination of Clinton. Really? He gets worse and worse as we get closer to the election.
You should be totally embarrassed by making such a ridiculous statement, he in no way said any such thing. You look very foolish for suggesting such a thing...
You should be totally embarrassed by making such a ridiculous statement, he in no way said any such thing. You look very foolish for suggesting such a thing...
Please read this post again and maybe you will understand the problem. Just because you heard it differently the fact is enough people heard it as a hint to the gun folks that it created this possbility. Is it a long shot that someone would actually do this? Of course, but why even create the possibility? He simply has to be smarter than to say things like this but he does not appear to be now does he? That my friend is the problem with your candidate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945
Here is something to think about, and what makes this statement by Trump so reckless and irresponsible. Somewhere in this country there is some mentally ill guy sitting in his room, and when he hears Trump make a statement like that, it triggers something in him and he suddenly feels he will be famous if he does what Trump hinted at.
Last edited by DaveinMtAiry; 08-11-2016 at 03:14 AM..
No they didn't. Trump is a Democratic plant. New emails come out showing clear fraudulent and possibly criminal activities with Hillary involved. Then the father of the Orlando shooter shows up at a Hillary rally behind her sending her campaign into scramble mode to try and come up with excuses why. As soon as the media starts to focus on it, here comes Trump saying something to once again take the heat off her and shift the media's attention to him. Thats what? about the 23rd time this has happened now? Its blatantly obvious he's a plant.
so you are saying the media refuses to do their jobs because Trump?
Trump controls the media and how they report?
You sound more clueless by the day. It doesn't matter what Trump says or doesn't say, the media will never investigate Hillary or go after her. The Clintons are untouchables since the 90's. The FBI investigation proved it.
the media buying the Hillary's spin on the Russians to cover for her emails and future emails is a tactic that has nothing to do with Trump. The media is going after Assange too, blaming the messenger to protect Hillary and blame it all on Russia.
they have plenty of evidence and material to go after Hillary and they refuse, for you to say its all Trump's fault shows you have no idea what's going on.
the media can't chew gum and walk at the same time......they can't report the Hillary emails which is the real news because it has to do about corruption at the highest levels of government and cover up because they are obsessed with Trump.
yeah its all Trump's fault that the media refuses to do their jobs.....he controls the media.....give me a break.
The media can report on both.......to say its Trump's fault because the media is protecting hillary and only reporting on Trump is being clueless....this is all by design.
so you are saying the media refuses to do their jobs because Trump?
Trump controls the media and how they report?
You sound more clueless by the day. It doesn't matter what Trump says or doesn't say, the media will never investigate Hillary or go after her. The Clintons are untouchables since the 90's. The FBI investigation proved it.
the media buying the Hillary's spin on the Russians to cover for her emails and future emails is a tactic that has nothing to do with Trump. The media is going after Assange too, blaming the messenger to protect Hillary and blame it all on Russia.
they have plenty of evidence and material to go after Hillary and they refuse, for you to say its all Trump's fault shows you have no idea what's going on.
So your position is the media has just not covered all the controversy surrounding Hillary? We have not heard about Hillary's emails daily for the past 9 months?
Interesting perspective.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.