Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Can I remind you that Assange doesn't hack. Someone who does, gives him the goods. Assange just takes a data dump and puts it in a readable sequence by topic before releasing it. Therefore, the hacker can always give it to someone else.
In other words, if Assange gets 3 years worth of Clinton emails, all of Clinton's "yoga emails" will show up together, if Assange wanted to release the truth about Hillary and yoga...hopefully, there would be photo attachments.
Makes it easier on the media who don't have to go through the whole mess just to find out who she was really meeting for yoga and how many times she did, for example.
Well, given the law doesn't seem to apply to the hil types and such, the elite protected class, assange is just playing the same game and the hil supporters don't like it.
Well I'll be......boo hoo.
How it feel coming the other way? No like?
Quote:
Originally Posted by take57
Release the tax returns and the emails.
Don't forget hils speeches to wall street she wouldn't turn over despite sander's/now hilly fan sander's. She's got much more to turn over herself/shouldn't be a hypocrite and keep harping on trump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by justNancy
Reasonable people wouldn't be encouraging illegal hacking or calling it "evidence."
Reasonable people wouldn't be voting for someone putting classified info on a personal/against the rules server. And a sane populace wouldn't be voting for a person the fbi director called "extremely careless". And on and on and on....
The leaks are for reasonable people that are willing to view evidence objectively.
...says someone who's backing a man who's downright scientifically illiterate, creates conspiracy theories, and rejects the input of experts in their own field of expertise... you're surely thinking objectively...
Can I remind you that Assange doesn't hack. Someone who does, gives him the goods. Assange just takes a data dump and puts it in a readable sequence by topic before releasing it. Therefore, the hacker can always give it to someone else.
In other words, if Assange gets 3 years worth of Clinton emails, all of Clinton's "yoga emails" will show up together, if Assange wanted to release the truth about Hillary and yoga...hopefully, there would be photo attachments.
Makes it easier on the media who don't have to go through the whole mess just to find out who she was really meeting for yoga and how many times she did, for example.
And you know he does not hack because?! The guy understand that system well, he may be limited to what he can do personally but he hacks and he is a criminal- Your hero no doubt
Trumpkins, if this Assange thing was serious then you would see the concern in Hillary Clinton or her surrogates. The fact they have no worry at all shows this Assange this is a bunch of BS and he likely has nothing
Just like they had the "concern" before the DNC meeting and had wassy/shultzy speaking on the sched up to the last minute before the wiki leaks turned something rather interesting on her?
Now I know some of you have clairvoyant talents/have been predicting the election and all with 100% accuracy but really 2950....
2950.......start from zero again....that "analysis" was stalled at the gate based on the results at the wonderful world of the DNC.
Reasonable people wouldn't be voting for someone putting classified info on a personal/against the rules server. And a sane populace wouldn't be voting for a person the fbi director called "extremely careless". And on and on and on....
This should be a very good indicator for you regarding how unfit people think Trump is... Trump represents an immediate danger with his narcissism, unpredictability, irrationality, and unpreparedness. Although she comes with great concerns, Clinton does not represent an immediate danger.
This should be a very good indicator for you regarding how unfit people think Trump is... Trump represents an immediate danger with his narcissism, unpredictability, irrationality, and unpreparedness. Although she comes with great concerns, Clinton does not represent an immediate danger.
Could be but we don't know what kind of politician he would be for sure as he has no record as one....he never served as a politician so it's just a guess by anyone.
However, what we know 100% is about hil as a politician and the results are clear. You like "Extremely careless"/someone working with a concussion who claimed they couldn't recall a bunch of things/didn't have the good sense to take a leave of absence? That's who you like with the finger on the "button"?
You guys.....really....a little logic/common sense here if you want to make a convincing argument. At least try.
Because Assange, like Trump, is an egomaniac narcissist who cares more about the drama, attention and adulation than the substance. That 6x6 room must be closing in on him bigly. He fancies himself a puppetmaster, while simultaneously being manipulated by Putin. He has no interest in the public good, only the Assange attention factory.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
