Clinton Campaign Steals from Poor Donors - Bank Fraud
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The article itself points out, "This is theft, fraud or wire fraud—it’s a federal crime!”
what else do you need?
you want someone to provide you the statute in the actual code? LOL.
If someone authorizes an organization to automatically bill them, such as I do for charities, it is authorized and not a crime. The issue then only becomes whether the cardholder checked make periodic donations.
If someone authorizes an organization to automatically bill them, such as I do for charities, it is authorized and not a crime. The issue then only becomes whether the cardholder checked make periodic donations.
Yes, all of these democrats are so stupid they don't know what box that they checked.
LOL so some right wingers decided to donate multiple times to the Clinton campaign, and then claim that the Clinton campaigned billed them multiple times without their consent
This is a pathetic set up! I thought right wingers say the Clinton campaign has billions of money behind them!??
LOL so some right wingers decided to donate multiple times to the Clinton campaign, and then claim that the Clinton campaigned billed them multiple times without their consent
This is a pathetic set up! I thought right wingers say the Clinton campaign has billions of money behind them!??
Ok, you go with that and see how much traction it gets.
Hilalry stole money from the elderly, and the poor.
Why isn't the hundreds of millions she is getting from the donor class enough for her?
Location: 23.7 million to 162 million miles North of Venus
23,192 posts, read 12,303,428 times
Reputation: 10315
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech
If someone authorizes an organization to automatically bill them, such as I do for charities, it is authorized and not a crime. The issue then only becomes whether the cardholder checked make periodic donations.
In the OP article it was stated that the woman checked the box for a one time donation of $25. The campaign took that original donation, then took $25 two more times, then they took $19. If the woman had set it up to be a recurring charge they wouldn't have taken just $19 on that last charge, they would have taken another $25.
The campaign does it that way to keep the fraudulent thefts under $100 so that the banks won't initiate fraud investigations on their own, the victim would have to report the thefts for the bank to do a fraud investigation. One single bank, Wells Fargo, is receiving around 100 reports of theft by the Clinton campaign every single day....that's just one bank, no telling how many calls other banks are receiving. The greedy biotch stole more than $2.8 million in 2007 and 2008 by doing the exact same thing, fraudulently charging donors cards for more than they actually donated....so yep, she has a history of illegally stealing from donors credit/bank cards.
Ahem, that "article" is published in the Observer. The Observer is published by Jared Kushner, who is married to Ivanka Trump, which makes the publisher Donald Trump's son-in-law. Nuff said about the Observer "Exclusive."
Are you saying the Jared Kushner made the whole thing up? There are links in the article that take you to NY Times and Daily Kos that reveal that Clinton did almost the same thing in 2007-2008 when she ran for the presidency.
If someone authorizes an organization to automatically bill them, such as I do for charities, it is authorized and not a crime. The issue then only becomes whether the cardholder checked make periodic donations.
That is true but not in this case. Did you even look at the billings and how they were laid out. Did you hear the son say he was trying to stop it and they kept taking it out? Yes, I realize that if you read the article and listen to the video, it will make your job much harder, defending someone for whom there is no defense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by michiganmoon
Yes, all of these democrats are so stupid they don't know what box that they checked.
Well, since it worked for them in 2008, I mean, if crime works for you and you aren't punished......
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalk
LOL so some right wingers decided to donate multiple times to the Clinton campaign, and then claim that the Clinton campaigned billed them multiple times without their consent
This is a pathetic set up! I thought right wingers say the Clinton campaign has billions of money behind them!??
You didn't bother with the article did you? They do have billions but it is never enough. Hillary is outspending Trump by leaps and bounds and still can't capture a true lead.
Quote:
Originally Posted by berdee
In the OP article it was stated that the woman checked the box for a one time donation of $25. The campaign took that original donation, then took $25 two more times, then they took $19. If the woman had set it up to be a recurring charge they wouldn't have taken just $19 on that last charge, they would have taken another $25.
The campaign does it that way to keep the fraudulent thefts under $100 so that the banks won't initiate fraud investigations on their own, the victim would have to report the thefts for the bank to do a fraud investigation. One single bank, Wells Fargo, is receiving around 100 reports of theft by the Clinton campaign every single day....that's just one bank, no telling how many calls other banks are receiving. The greedy biotch stole more than $2.8 million in 2007 and 2008 by doing the exact same thing, fraudulently charging donors cards for more than they actually donated....so yep, she has a history of illegally stealing from donors credit/bank cards.
She's a thief!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They don't read the articles, because if they did, how would they defend what is actually done. It worked before so they did it again. Isn't that the Clinton legacy?
Imagine all the people that didn't see these charges like that, hopefully, people will see the story and check their statements. I think the word really needs to get out to lower income and seniors who might have given her money.
The Clintons and those that support them..................
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.