Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:39 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,098,111 times
Reputation: 6842

Advertisements

I think he might have. He might be too conservative for some but he would have kept on message, kept the attack on Hillary, and not making any self inflicted wound really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:40 PM
 
4,540 posts, read 2,784,951 times
Reputation: 4921
Cruz or Trump can not beat Hillary. Almost any other Republican could, Rubio probably had the best shot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:42 PM
 
11,755 posts, read 7,117,231 times
Reputation: 8011
Ted would have gotten crushed by a massive landslide. Trump was the better choice.

He is too far to the right on the ideological scale. The American electorate's ideologies are distributed like a bell curve. Too far to one end, and you won't get enough votes. And no one likes him, he is too annoying and ugly, and his dad is a nut. Nothing personal, don't hate the messenger.

Sorry.

Mick
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:44 PM
 
Location: new yawk zoo
8,693 posts, read 11,081,311 times
Reputation: 6366
is it a contest who can lie more? Sounds pretty tough
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:47 PM
 
1,166 posts, read 755,349 times
Reputation: 1877
I don't believe that Cruz would have even kept it close. His creepy persona and his fundy evangelical beliefs turn off a lot of people. He would have been a perfect Republican in the 80s, when the Religious Right was riding high. The culture has shifted too far for Cruz to be a viable national candidate.


I think Kasich, Rubio or Bush would have won big versus Clinton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:48 PM
 
51,653 posts, read 25,819,464 times
Reputation: 37889
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTQ3000 View Post
Ted would have gotten crushed by a massive landslide. Trump was the better choice.

He is too far to the right on the ideological scale. The American electorate's ideologies are distributed like a bell curve. Too far to one end, and you won't get enough votes. And no one likes him, he is too annoying and ugly, and his dad is a nut. Nothing personal, don't hate the messenger.

Sorry.

Mick
I don't think Cruz could have pulled it off either. Not only is it too far down the tail of the bell curve, but I agree with Boehner, Cruz is a "miserable SOB."

That would have come out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:49 PM
 
16,212 posts, read 10,823,172 times
Reputation: 8442
I think it would have been the same. Cruz was way too extreme right. I am an independent and if had to choose between Cruz and Trump, I'd choose Trump and Trump is an a$$hole but Cruz it an outright nutcase IMO.

I do believe that Rubio or Kasich would have beat HRC though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,218 posts, read 22,365,741 times
Reputation: 23858
No.

Ted is too much Torquemada, the inquisitor who tortured and burned all heretics at the stake.
Torquemada wasn't respected. He was feared. Cruz is neither respected nor feared, but he sure wants to be.

Once in the Senate, he was ignored and despised. And now, his Senate re-election chances are dimming.

Rightly so. Cruz comes across as the oily creep who makes a pass at your girlfriend by quoting Bible verses in a high whiny voice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2016, 02:54 PM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,069 posts, read 6,970,740 times
Reputation: 5654
Maybe he could have won FL, NC and OH but after that I don't know.

I don't think Cruz could have won VA or PA and certainly not WI, MI, CO or NV

I don't think he had any chance of getting more than 264 electoral votes. People dislike Hillary a lot but Cruz is way too conservative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-07-2016, 03:04 PM
 
7,982 posts, read 4,287,627 times
Reputation: 6744
What am I missing? Isn't Rubio sharing that same spot on the bell curve? I think Rubio would've beat her, and I think Cruz would've beat her.

....which is why I'm very glad the GOP presented The Great Pumpkin instead.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top