Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As the evidence will never be presented in a court of law, there will be no legal proof. Of course, the evidence is quite damning and the law pretty simple, so...
Nononono. The cost had to be paid for by a charity. Funneling through a charity is simply an end-run around the embargo. And there's still the small matter of specific authorization, but we both know you're going to ignore that.
Calling out a hypocrite for hypocriticak behavior is hardly a "hit piece".
I'm pretty sure Obama visited Cuba as well.
And Clintons travel costs are also funneled through the Clinton Foundation. So whats your point? its ok for one, but not the other?
It's a point of view, certainly. So I guess in your mind, this isn't a legal issue, merely a matter of brazen hypocrisy?
The problem is that there isn't enough evidence to show anything, and certainly not any illegal activity.
The very worst case scenario is that people when to scout Cuba for business opportunities for when Castro was out, and the embargo was lifted. Sorry, but nobody cares.
This isn't like say, blatant pay for play, or espionage that you dems seem to have absolutely no problem with as long as it the Clintons doing it.
Wow.. newsweek? That makes it noteworthy, given the whole magazine company was sold for a whopping $1
Next they will attack Trumps "bankruptcies", which would be ironic given the fact above..
I don't see your point. Newsweek sold for $1 in 2010 with the new owners assuming all financial liabilities. Newsweek did not go bankrupt and all debtors were paid.
He's able to deny so much since his brand is a yuge conglomerate. He's mostly a figure-head. Probably doesn't have a clue to most of what's going on under his brand umbrella.
He's able to deny so much since his brand is a yuge conglomerate. He's mostly a figure-head. Probably doesn't have a clue to most of what's going on under his brand umbrella.
Also, his campaign manager states that he says things that aren't true because he doesn't know if they are true or not.
Also, his campaign manager states that he says things that aren't true because he doesn't know if they are true or not.
Kind of mind boggling.
And, the liberals really care about truth? Too funny!
I never understood the embargo while we were trading with many countries that suppress minorities and women. And, with China, I never understood that when it came to human rights. So, I consider this, true or not, a non-issue. I an much more concerned about the well being of our economy and our security.
And, the liberals really care about truth? Too funny!
I never understood the embargo while we were trading with many countries that suppress minorities and women. And, with China, I never understood that when it came to human rights. So, I consider this, true or not, a non-issue. I an much more concerned about the well being of our economy and our security.
I see the Trumpistas have settled on the "That's called business, by the way" line of defense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
