Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One of the clearest takeaways for me from the debate is that sticking Trump in "No Man's Land", with dozens of Republicans who endorsed him either revoking their endorsements or otherwise withholding their support from him going forward, has pushed Trump past a point of no return. They've been calling it a "scorched earth" approach, with Trump intent on taking down anything in the way of his grab for power, whether it be friend or foe, and without regard to how the destruction he aims to wreak damages not just his opponent, but the nation as a whole.
Like a child who destroys a sibling's toy after being scolded for taking it without permission, it seems Trump has decided that if he cannot be President then no one should be able to be President.
I am deeply troubled by the national existential crisis brought about by Trump's behavior and conduct. When we moved to Georgia it never occurred to me that that decision may someday affect to what nation am I a citizen. I have long considered myself an American, rather than a citizen of any of the states I've lived in since graduating college. While I was proud to become a Georgian and revel in its unique cultural cuisine and its wonderful natural magnificence, I never intended it to result in my being a foreigner traveling abroad when visiting my family in other states. However, I no longer see that prospect as fanciful nonsense. Trump has, mostly single-handedly, undermined the foundation of our nation.
Trump's losing the election won't fix any of the damage he's caused. His damage is the kind of insidious damage that isn't wiped away by counter-action. He's afflicted people with intransigent unwillingness to abide the fact that reasonable people disagree with them, in a way that any attempt at reconciliation and remediation instead reinforces the sentiment rather than dissipates it.
Trump was more than happy to attack the Clinton's on Bill's infidelity, while Hillary refrained from doing the same to Trump. That shows the difference in class between the two candidates.
It was disgraceful the way they continuously attacked him and defended her. Absolutely pathetic. At one point, after Hillary finished talking, that nasty hag Martha said "let me explain what she meant" and then went on for a minute or so explaining hillarys answer. like shiver me timber pointed out, raddatz was awful during the obama/Romney debate and she was even worse last night!
While you bash corporate media, please remember that had it not been for the billions in free tv time given to Trump during the primary, your candidate would be Jeb.
It was disgraceful the way they continuously attacked him and defended her. Absolutely pathetic. At one point, after Hillary finished talking, that nasty hag Martha said "let me explain what she meant" and then went on for a minute or so explaining hillarys answer. like shiver me timber pointed out, raddatz was awful during the obama/Romney debate and she was even worse last night!
Agreed how pathetic it is that they do this. Even an amateur would know to stay the hell out of the debate and just ask the questions.
Yet we have the 'professionals' here that can't keep neutral.
How many American Voters are really "Undecided" voters ? How many will make up their mind only after seeing the performance of the candidates in the debate ?
Barring the elite or political bigwigs, I dont think that there are many people who will change their stance. They have already made up their mind. Mr Trump is going to win.
Not many and not a lot honestly. Trump needed to hit two grand slams last night to make any real difference. Instead he barely beat out a lead off single in the second inning. His base will love it but they were already voting for him. He didn't win over any real new voters is the issue.
According to the U.S. Intelligence Community, "Only Russia’s senior-most officials could have authorized" the hack.
So how was her statement a lie?
There is no factual evidence tying Russia with all of these leaks. The media, Hillary, the libs, the "US" (please) needs to just stop lying. Everytime Hillary looks bad, she blames Russia. The "US" needs to prove it or shut up.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
like shiver me timber pointed out, raddatz was awful during the obama/Romney debate and she was even worse last night!
