Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Real Clear Politics Average has Clinton at +6.2 in the head-to-head with Trump right now, and if you take out the LA Times poll (which has them tied), that becomes a solid +7.
It appears that even the most devout Trump supporters no longer have even the inaccurate polls on their side. Giving Trump a 6 or 7 point boost due to bad methodology still isn't enough to give him a lead.
It's funny to think back to all of the people I've heard say it would be a Trump landslide and the talk of a "silent majority." Trump will almost certainly finish with the lowest percentage of votes since John Q Adams in 1824 (30.91%)! And to think people have raved about how Trump has been so popular....
The Real Clear Politics Average has Clinton at +6.2 in the head-to-head with Trump right now, and if you take out the LA Times poll (which has them tied), that becomes a solid +7.
It appears that even the most devout Trump supporters no longer have even the inaccurate polls on their side. Giving Trump a 6 or 7 point boost due to bad methodology still isn't enough to give him a lead.
It's funny to think back to all of the people I've heard say it would be a Trump landslide and the talk of a "silent majority." Trump will almost certainly finish with the lowest percentage of votes since John Q Adams in 1824 (30.91%)! And to think people have raved about how Trump has been so popular....
I doubt that. Don't count your chickens yet. I would rather neither Trump or HRC be elected President. Unfortunately we can't elect a care taker Govt. I will vote for Trump as I simply will not vote for someone who will try to raise my federal tax so I can pay for others college, etc. If I were polled I would not answer, or say I am undecided. I am highly educated, and high income, and there are many who fall into my bucket. I also like the idea of a non politician being elected president.
I doubt that. Don't count your chickens yet. I would rather neither Trump or HRC be elected President. Unfortunately we can't elect a care taker Govt. I will vote for Trump as I simply will not vote for someone who will try to raise my federal tax so I can pay for others college, etc. If I were polled I would not answer, or say I am undecided. I am highly educated, and high income, and there are many who fall into my bucket. I also like the idea of a non politician being elected president.
Ah yes, the often touted "Hidden Trump voter." The one polls are missing all the time.
I doubt that. Don't count your chickens yet. I would rather neither Trump or HRC be elected President. Unfortunately we can't elect a care taker Govt. I will vote for Trump as I simply will not vote for someone who will try to raise my federal tax so I can pay for others college, etc. If I were polled I would not answer, or say I am undecided. I am highly educated, and high income, and there are many who fall into my bucket. I also like the idea of a non politician being elected president.
I love how the Trump guys loved to point to the polls when he was doing well, then they dismiss them when they turn ugly. You aren't fooling anyone.
It's because they didn't call the black guy in Illinois this week. Seriously.
Quote:
There is a 19-year-old black man in Illinois who has no idea of the role he is playing in this election...
Our Trump-supporting friend in Illinois is a surprisingly big part of the reason. In some polls, he’s weighted as much as 30 times more than the average respondent, and as much as 300 times more than the least-weighted respondent.
Continue reading the main story
Alone, he has been enough to put Mr. Trump in double digits of support among black voters. He can improve Mr. Trump’s margin by 1 point in the survey, even though he is one of around 3,000 panelists.
He is also the reason Mrs. Clinton took the lead in the U.S.C./LAT poll for the first time in a month on Wednesday. The poll includes only the last seven days of respondents, and he hasn’t taken the poll since Oct. 4. Mrs. Clinton surged once he was out of the sample for the first time in several weeks.
And someone is too dumb to notice the dates. Noteworthy is how the dates polled always differ from the dates published.
One would think it's not rocket science, but for Hillbots, pretty much everything is rocket science.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
