Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-13-2016, 08:43 AM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,002 posts, read 12,583,387 times
Reputation: 8916

Advertisements

We need policy that differentiates between gains of the venture capitalists who create and the vampire capitalists that specialize in destroying with the Buy company -> Debt -> Payouts to new owners -> Bankrupt the company and go to the next one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2016, 10:07 AM
 
549 posts, read 292,078 times
Reputation: 360
Great vid by the vlogbrothers (of Scishow fame) nicely lays out the differences in tax plans:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgicDQHbV3M
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2016, 12:38 PM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,697,519 times
Reputation: 3174
So, with all the responses that trump's plan would work better than clinton's plan, I'm wondering how a nonpartisan organization with experts doing the analysis, the Tax Policy Institute, could be so incredibly wrong about it.

"The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center aims to provide independent analyses of current and longer-term tax issues and to communicate its analyses to the public and to policymakers in a timely and accessible manner. The Center combines top national experts in tax, expenditure, budget policy, and microsimulation modeling to concentrate on four overarching areas of tax policy that are critical to future debate."

About the Tax Policy Center | Tax Policy Center

I mean, heck, yeah... there is a world of difference between 1.8% and .2%. Not to mention, the world of difference between 1.8% and the 10% he is hawking on his commercial. No 'truth in advertising' issue, there, eh?

Trump:
"The TPC estimates that those in top 0.1% of households -- who have incomes topping $3.7 million -- would see their tax bill cut by $1.1 million on average, or 14%.
By contrast, those in the very middle of the income distribution would see an average tax cut of $1,010, or 1.8%."

Clinton:
"The top 0.1% would see their tax bill go up on average by more than $800,000, or nearly 11%.
By contrast those in the middle of the income distribution would see their tax bill cut by $110, or 0.2%"

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton tax plans 'mirror images' of each other - Oct. 11, 2016
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2016, 12:49 PM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,057,521 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
Originally Posted by kat in aiken View Post
So, with all the responses that trump's plan would work better than clinton's plan, I'm wondering how a nonpartisan organization with experts doing the analysis, the Tax Policy Institute, could be so incredibly wrong about it.

"The Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center aims to provide independent analyses of current and longer-term tax issues and to communicate its analyses to the public and to policymakers in a timely and accessible manner. The Center combines top national experts in tax, expenditure, budget policy, and microsimulation modeling to concentrate on four overarching areas of tax policy that are critical to future debate."

About the Tax Policy Center | Tax Policy Center

I mean, heck, yeah... there is a world of difference between 1.8% and .2%. Not to mention, the world of difference between 1.8% and the 10% he is hawking on his commercial. No 'truth in advertising' issue, there, eh?

Trump:
"The TPC estimates that those in top 0.1% of households -- who have incomes topping $3.7 million -- would see their tax bill cut by $1.1 million on average, or 14%.
By contrast, those in the very middle of the income distribution would see an average tax cut of $1,010, or 1.8%."

Clinton:
"The top 0.1% would see their tax bill go up on average by more than $800,000, or nearly 11%.
By contrast those in the middle of the income distribution would see their tax bill cut by $110, or 0.2%"

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton tax plans 'mirror images' of each other - Oct. 11, 2016
Here is a quote from the actual report Analysis of Donald Trump's Tax Plan
Quote:
Middle-income households would receive an average tax cut of $2,700, or 4.9 percent of after-tax income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2016, 12:54 PM
 
4,288 posts, read 2,057,521 times
Reputation: 2815
Quote:
The plan would increase the standard deduction in 2015 from$6,300 to $25,000 for single filersand from $12,600 to $50,000 for married couples filing jointly, while maintaining existing personal and dependent exemptions ($4,000 per person in 2015).
A married couple with 2 children could earn $66,000 and pay no federal income tax.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top