U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-14-2016, 09:20 AM
 
9,764 posts, read 3,160,589 times
Reputation: 4052

Advertisements

According to Hillary's shills, Russia or Assange are doctoring these messages. Lol.

Funny how they never said that back when Bush was being exposed by Assange.


They cheered the release of docs on Iraq and Afghanistan but find it appalling that Assange is now going only after Hillary.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-14-2016, 09:38 AM
 
Location: Sitting on a bar stool. Guinness in hand.
4,429 posts, read 5,667,284 times
Reputation: 1698
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeyJude514 View Post
Judging from the numerous breathless threads here which promise all kinds of juicy revelations but produce absolutely nothing, I'd say Wikileaks has been a great big fat failure by way of producing anything incriminating against Hillary.

What does the cult have left to hang their hopes on now?
Well you may want to ask Debbie Wasserman-Shultz if WikiLeaks has been a total bust. Really the Democratic Party in general has taken the brunt of the hit from WikiLeak. i'd say there's a good portion of people that are On the left side of party that are unhappy with the leadership of the party. I think this might be on futher on display in the next presidential election cycle as opposed to this one. But we will see.

As for Hillary. I'd say for the most part WikiLeaks hasn't done all that much to sway anybody away from voting for her that already hadn't decided to do so. Let's face it she's been in the spotlight for a very long time. And most of the "revelations" aren't really all that new to the general public. Nothing is shocking. Pretty much most people know who and what she is. Maybe if she was running against anybody else but Trump, who has his own problems, maybe these "scandals" could hold more weight on the publics mind. But let's face it were in an election cycle with dueling scandals between the candidates .....one right after the other. So really people are rather Calais at this point towards any new sensational news.

Plus on top of this. Hillary has an ace in the hole which is the Supreme Court. As I've been saying for a while here people on the left would vote for the devil if they could move the court leftwards. So any "scandal" would be overlooked in order to gain the price of a more left Supreme Court.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 09:45 AM
 
69,372 posts, read 55,464,694 times
Reputation: 9363
Quote:
Originally Posted by GHOSTRIDER AZ View Post
Leaks brings reinforcement to the Corruption of Clinton
^^^^^^^ This

While the OP is thrilled they arent bringing Clinton down.. They however are validating the corruption of not only Clinton, but also the DNC and the establishment, therefore confirming the argument for Trump and other anti establishment candidates.

Since this isnt going away any time soon, and the information will continue to come out, even after Clinton will become President. hold on folks, things will get rather bumpy in the future.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 09:47 AM
 
69,372 posts, read 55,464,694 times
Reputation: 9363
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
Oh yeah, if you can't believe a man charged with rape , who is hiding out in the Ecuadorian Embassy to avoid extradition, who can you believe ? He has all the credibility I need !!!


Don
Ones guilty or innocence of one crime, does not mean they dont have evidence of others..

Ask most mob organizations for validation..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 09:49 AM
 
69,372 posts, read 55,464,694 times
Reputation: 9363
Quote:
Originally Posted by mohawkx View Post
Would that rule apply to Hillary who has never been charged with a crime? Only investigated and hounded by every backwater republican politician for the last 30 years?
Or Osama Bin Laden, He's never been charged either ya know..

hell, Trump hasnt been either, but that hasnt stopped the left from claiming he's Hitler..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 09:55 AM
 
5,418 posts, read 2,003,807 times
Reputation: 6864
Wikileaks used to have a reputation for being a neutral hacker with a white hat, exposing wrongdoing by any institution regardless of politics. All of that has been thrown out the window. Wikileaks has lost its neutrality, it has been revealed to be a middleman and a front for Russian intelligence and disinformation operations. A shill for Putin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 10:00 AM
 
69,372 posts, read 55,464,694 times
Reputation: 9363
Quote:
Originally Posted by don1945 View Post
I think it is more like "100 orders of magnitude better than Trump. " Assange has an agenda, and it it to save his own butt.
How the hell, is this going to "save his own butt"? Clinton talked about BOMBING HIM
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 10:02 AM
 
69,372 posts, read 55,464,694 times
Reputation: 9363
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
Wikileaks used to have a reputation for being a neutral hacker with a white hat, exposing wrongdoing by any institution regardless of politics. All of that has been thrown out the window. Wikileaks has lost its neutrality, it has been revealed to be a middleman and a front for Russian intelligence and disinformation operations. A shill for Putin.
No one has claimed the documents leaked arent true, nor is there any evidence the info is coming from "Putin"..

But good job at parroting the talking points they want you to hear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 10:03 AM
 
69,372 posts, read 55,464,694 times
Reputation: 9363
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
According to Hillary's shills, Russia or Assange are doctoring these messages. Lol.
The weird part is, no one even is claiming they are doctored.. NOT ONE person who is the sender of the emails being released, has made any such claim..

Its just another LIE from talking points on tv, and they repeat them as if they are true..

The left is full of idiots...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-14-2016, 10:09 AM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
30,989 posts, read 13,558,751 times
Reputation: 22077
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
Agreed. I don't see the scandal. What...that Hillary made certain statements in public and then altered those statements to fit private conversations and privately made speeches? Big whoop.
And what politician hasn't? A politician might privately be pro-choice but support abortion bans because his party platform and his constituency demand it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads
Follow City-Data.com founder on our Forum or

All times are GMT -6.

2005-2019, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 - Top