Michelle Obama...no woman should be treated this way! A 12 yr old rape victim deserved that too! (legal, accuse)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
But she was never proud of this Country to begin with! Not even with a free ride through College!
I don't think we would be having this discussion n if trump was grabbing his own crotch. The same people who would argue that throwing popcorn at you is assault and you are warranted to stand your ground and kill someone, are the same people who now say grabbing ***** is OK or kissing with out permission is just unwanted advances. That's why there is a basketful.
Umm..i dont know what you are reading, but nothing in that post that you are referencing mentions anything about "Getting a child rapist off", but rather that she laughed about it. A point snopes agknowledges
She chuckled about the situation, not at the victim. She was an inexperienced 27 year old lawyer getting assigned to an impossible task of defending a child rapist.
She chuckled about the situation, not at the victim. She was an inexperienced 27 year old lawyer getting assigned to an impossible task of defending a child rapist.
Not inexperienced enough to totally write off polygraphs. And let's not act like a 27 yr old is 14 yrs old.
Not inexperienced enough to totally write off polygraphs. And let's not act like a 27 yr old is 14 yrs old.
What?
Added by edit.
Are you saying a 27 year old fresh out of law school lawyer is on top of the game? I'm an engineer, and I sure as hell wouldn't trust a 27 year old fresh out of grad school engineer to design and build a bridge.
The real question here is why do conservatives hate the 6th amendment?
It's a useful litmus test that neatly separates the authoritarians from those with an actual, not feigned, libertarian mindset.
A defendant in criminal court is an individual who has all the resources of government aligned against him. If you're serious about small government, libertarian principles etc. etc., you should be insistent that government is forced to prove its case by the rules and by the book, every time. If you're decrying "technicalities" or arguing that those who hold the government up to the highest possible standard - the defense attorneys - should somehow be chastised for lack of morals, then you're but an authoritarian, willing to overlook abuse of power.
Are you saying a 27 year old fresh out of law school lawyer is on top of the game? I'm an engineer, and I sure as hell wouldn't trust a 27 year old fresh out of grad school engineer to design and build a bridge.
When it comes to defending a guilty person of a heinous rape and making stuff up about the victim fantasizing about it....you either have it in you or you don't. A large percentage of Americans would not do that under any circumstance. Sorry.
Funny how quickly you want to discard the Constitution. As a court appointed defender, Hillary Clinton provided a defendant with his Constitutional rights to a defense.
And repeating the lie that she laughed about the crime or getting the defendant off is just stupidity at this point given how many times it's been debunked.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
