Newsgate 2016 - The Players

[MTQ3000]

Originally Posted by AZLiam

She is a seasoned, veteran journalist. Do you actually have anything substantive to offer?

You mean just like the journalists y'all criticize? Anything substantive to offer?

Mick

[AZLiam]

Originally Posted by MTQ3000

You mean just like the journalists y'all criticize? Anything substantive to offer?

Mick

It's not worth repeating.

[Merge]

Ok dude.

You're just a truth-teller... who repeatedly links to fraudulent media sites in attempts to prop up your demagogue. I got it. We all get it.

If you interpret that a "personal attack", then I suggest you revisit your decision to continue posting garbage.

[Vector1]

Originally Posted by AZLiam

Do you see this as unethical or responsible?

Here is a list of the "Players" - you can read more here: https://sharylattkisson.com/newsgate-2016/

Sharyl is a professional journalist who has investigated both political parties. Reading her book, it is evident things have gotten way out of hand with the corruption that is ignored because of the collusion between the Democrats and the main media on TV and in print.

https://www.amazon.com/Stonewalled-O.../dp/1511325739


Even Kriston Powers who is an admitted unashamed liberal says she was thwarted at every turn by leftists ;


https://www.amazon.com/Silencing-Lef...on+powers+book


`

[Vector1]

Originally Posted by Merge

Very amusing.

I find it pretty ironic that the Trump Cult has chosen the "MSM" as the scapegoat for their inability to win, especially since it was the "MSM" in the form of FOX NEWS that enabled Trump's nomination in the first place.

Even if I were to accept your premise that FOX leans right or is hard right (not including the talking head opinion shows), that is 1 vs. 7 outlets.

All one needs to do is set their DVR's to record multiple sources to see for themselves the coverage of Trump saying the P-word(uncensored on CNN for the max effect)and accusations against him, vs. all the Hillary email revelations, FBI/DOJ stuff and of course the massive amounts of Wikileak hacked emails.

You'd think the stories would be 7 to 1 with anti-Hillary stuff since there is so much of it. Instead CNN & MSNBC alone ran almost 24/7 of anti-Trump stories for 3 days running.
The big 3 (ABC, CBS, NBC) had 9 minutes each of their approximately 20 minutes (not including commercials) dedicated to the salacious Trump stuff, and only 1 minute, 30 seconds, and ZERO seconds respectively about anything negative related to Hillary. This despite the voluminous amount of info released over the course of the past week. That is 27 minutes vs. 1 minute 30 seconds of prime time news coverage in one night among the big 3.

But what difference does it make to those whose candidate is benefiting from it, right?