Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Clinton claim is that she removed the items because they were hers that she brought with her when she became the Secretary of State ..... that all makes sense.
Her and Bill didn't even return them all. They paid money for some they wanted to keep (after trying to steal them)
It's rotten that she STOLE from the American public - the White House does not belong to the Clintons and neither does it's contents. Worse was that they vandalized the White House - defaced walls, stole door knobs, destroyed equipment, spread trash all over the place and switched the phones around so they wouldn't work.
It was Frat House stuff -- neither one of them have the right to live in that house after what they did.
Talk about Un-Stable ..... they KNEW they would be caught, they just didn't care. Sick People
The Clinton claim is that she removed the items because they were hers that she brought with her when she became the Secretary of State ..... that all makes sense.
Inventory at the start and at the end of her term confirms no items taken. Most likely explanation is that she brought a bunch of personal stuff at the start of her term, decided what she did and didn't need, and then took the unneeded things (that were already hers) home "EARLY in her tenure".
Inventory at the start and at the end of her term confirms no items taken. Most likely explanation is that she brought a bunch of personal stuff at the start of her term, decided what she did and didn't need, and then took the unneeded things (that were already hers) home "EARLY in her tenure".
You do understand that this not "gossip" OR Wiki-Leaks -- it is from Testimony in FBI files.
I really don't care what Clinton apologists are saying NOW to SPIN this.
It's Testimony in FBI Files from the FBI Vault released under a Congressional Subpoena, even though heavily redacted.
You do understand that this not "gossip" OR Wiki-Leaks -- it is from Testimony in FBI files.
I really don't care what Clinton apologists are saying NOW to SPIN this.
It's Testimony in FBI Files from the FBI Vault released under a Congressional Subpoena, even though heavily redacted.
Yes, an unmanned staffer told the FBI, they documented it, the staffer was mistaken about what they were reporting
You do understand that this not "gossip" OR Wiki-Leaks -- it is from Testimony in FBI files.
I really don't care what Clinton apologists are saying NOW to SPIN this.
It's Testimony in FBI Files from the FBI Vault released under a Congressional Subpoena, even though heavily redacted.
And you do understand that the testimony of a Diplomatic Security agent may be what he believed to be the case without actually being correct, right? I believe an on the record statement by an official State Department spokesperson that the inventory conducted at both the beginning and the end of Clinton's term as Secretary is more accurate than someone's belief, esp. when he admitted in that same testimony that he didn't know what happened to the allegedly stolen items. He was obviously not the most informed source on the subject.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
