Quote:
Originally Posted by Arabianhorsebreeder
First, they refuse to acknowledge the Wikileak emails, the O'Keefe videos, and the fact Trump and Hillary are tied per Rasmussen. Their goal is to convince voters Hillary has already won, so no need to go to the polls on Nov. 8th.
And second, the use of words like "fight night," "showdown," etc., to describe a presidential debate. It's not the candidates who have lowered the bar on our election process, it's the media. Pathetic and disgusting.
|
Could you imagine how unclose this process would be now if the major networks and newspapers were all just UNBIASED? I'm not even suggesting they be FOR trump, just report stories as they happen, for either side. Also, these moderators, nobody so far has been 'fair and balanced' if they were, it would just get Trump closer.
If you need moderators and media and current presidents AND a handful of prominent republicans and Trump is still tied or in the lead, what does that really tell you about who's the better candidiate? Without all the 'noise' and all these Lindsey Grahams, and Don Lemons and Anderson Coopers as Mod, this wouldn't even be a race, take out all the noise and its not close.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
