Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Chris Wallace was a horrible moderator
Wallace kept interrupting Trump every time Trump was making a great point against Hillary Wallace started butting in.. I got angry .. Wallace let Hillary talk and talk and never interrupted her when she was making her lying points.. Wallace I believe was very bias and didn't give Trump the time to make his points . Very suspect as Wallace just at the time Trump was getting the truth out about Hillary , boom, here comes Wallace again cutting off Trump. I was disgusted with Wallace.
Watch the debate and see the truth.. if you missed it. One must be vigilant in what a person is saying when they are cut off.
Could it be because Trump didn't answer any questions, and instead delivered his rehearsed lines with no regard to the questions.
Chris Wallace was far better than I expected. But I think that was because he did not follow through with his intention/thread to be just a timekeeper and not a fact checker. He was a great time keeper, a very good candidate controller, and within his very questions was the fact-checking. I applaud him.
I am also sometimes shocked at how much he looks and sounds like his father.
He did a good job, but let's not get carried away here. Trump was better behaved and it made the moderator look good. In the second half of the debate when Trump lost it, it went about the way it did in the first debate.
Chris Wallace was far better than I expected. But I think that was because he did not follow through with his intention/thread to be just a timekeeper and not a fact checker. He was a great time keeper, a very good candidate controller, and within his very questions was the fact-checking. I applaud him.
I am also sometimes shocked at how much he looks and sounds like his father.
Chris Wallace can ask tough questions without coming across as mean. His old man (Mike Wallace) could be pretty aggressive and seem a little vicious at times.
Having an even handed, professional journalist makes all of the difference in how a debate goes. The moderator's job is not to be a potted plant, nor part of the debate. CNN even published a lauding article overnight.
Why are you surprised? Chris Wallace is a Democrat. Democrats are fair and balanced®.
Also, the question about how they want the constitution interpreted (which both candidates completely ignored) was great. It would have been great if we had candidates intelligent enough to address that question.
Hillary graduated from Yale Law School. Why do you think she is not intelligent enough to answer that question?
I still think the microphone needs to be turned off when people speak out of turn.
But then the world wouldn't get to hear Trump make an utter ass of himself over and over.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
