Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Apples and oranges. We are talking about a viable, as in healthy fetus, and you deflect to a flawed fetus. AWe would prefer that a viable fetus be taken by C-section as opposed to being murdered.
You are risking the life of the mother over the life of the fetus at that point.
It's not about length of time, it's about risk of the procedure.
A C-Section is inherently more dangerous than an abortion, in fact, so is natural childbirth.
How long it takes to perform an abortion depends on the type of abortion being performed.
I worked at a clinic for several years, and as the owner of a vagina can tell you I have easily looked up and researched the risk factors for each online (considering I've been through 2 out of 3).
A C-section is not an easy procedure, FYI
It's far quicker than a late term abortion. That is what we have been discussing.
Apples and oranges. We are talking about a viable, as in healthy fetus, and you deflect to a flawed fetus. AWe would prefer that a viable fetus be taken by C-section as opposed to being murdered.
A healthy fetus can be delivered vaginally early. It happens every day.
Apples and oranges. We are talking about a viable, as in healthy fetus, and you deflect to a flawed fetus. AWe would prefer that a viable fetus be taken by C-section as opposed to being murdered.
viable fetus are not subject to late term abortions.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.