Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Broaddrick stated she wasn't assaulted. Then she says she was. She said she wasn't intimidated. Then she says she was. She was such an unreliable historian, that Starr wouldn't even use her as a witness.
From the sounds of things, she went to a motel room with Bill. She told her husband nothing happened. She told her married lover, that she was raped.
Lewinsky made it clear from the beginning that she was the one flipping her thong underwear, there was no assault involved.
Just thought I'd throw that in.
Incorrect. Monica was NOT in any position to give consent in this case.
Capacity to consent
A person’s capacity, or ability, to legally consent to sexual activity can be based on a number of factors, which often vary from state to state. In a criminal investigation, a state may use these factors to determine if a person who engaged in sexual activity had the capacity to consent. If not, the state may be able to charge the perpetrator with a crime. Examples of some factors that may contribute to someone’s capacity to consent include:
Relationship of victim/perpetrator: Was the alleged perpetrator in a position of authority, such as such as a teacher or correctional office?
Duh, Clinton was the president of United States, the most powerful position of authority in the country!
This alone proves that Clinton sexually assaulted Monica, and Hillary is just as guilty for supporting such a sexual predator.
You are correct. Clinton was in a position of power over Lewinsky and therefore she could not give consent.
That's one reason why I won't vote for Bill Clinton for POTUS.
Good thing he isn't on the ballot.
And now that you've finally come to understand the laws concerning sexual assault, as evidenced by your applying them to the Monica Lewinsky affair, do you have the integrity to admit you were wrong about Trump?
Thank you for proving me right again. You have been enormously helpful today.
I'll ask you again: Now that you've finally come to understand the laws concerning sexual assault, as evidenced by your applying them to the Monica Lewinsky affair, do you have the integrity to admit you were wrong about Trump?
You are correct. Clinton was in a position of power over Lewinsky and therefore she could not give consent.
That's one reason why I won't vote for Bill Clinton for POTUS.
Good thing he isn't on the ballot.
And now that you've finally come to understand the laws concerning sexual assault, as evidenced by your applying them to the Monica Lewinsky affair, do you have the integrity to admit you were wrong about Trump?
Once again, Hillary's support for Bill shows that she's just as guilty. Thank you for supporting both sexual predators.
Once again, Hillary's support for Bill shows that she's just as guilty.
No it doesn't. There is nothing on that page I provided the link to earlier that says a wife must condemn her husband for such transgressions.
I will ask you again: Do you have the integrity to admit you were wrong about Trump? Will you admit that what he's accused of constitutes sexual assault, and that there is enough evidence, at least with regard to the accusations from the People magazine writer (i.e., six outcry witnesses), to convict Trump of the crime, if the statute of limitations has not expired.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.