Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:37 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,975 posts, read 47,611,572 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Exactly. To put his reputation out there like that would be certain career suicide unless there's significant evidence to support the action that he took.
The DoJ actually told him that if he went to the media, he would violate their rules and he would be operating independently from the department. He said he was going to do it anyway out of fear of being accused of covering something up. He was basically afraid of the Congress.

 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:37 AM
 
27,624 posts, read 21,120,803 times
Reputation: 11095
Which trouble is that?
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:38 AM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,908,241 times
Reputation: 6714
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
Then why didn't get say so? If he was putting it out there due to transparency, or supplementing the record, then he should say he has significant evidence.

So why didn't he say that?
He doesn't have to say anything, he holds all of the cards. He will tell you once the indictment once it comes down, then we can watch the old crow have another attack...
He has mounds of evidence or he wouldn't have made the brazen move, he owe neither you of crooked hillary any explanation at this time.
This give you and the old bat plenty of time to stew in your own juices,,,
LOVE IT, Justice is finally on the way..
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:38 AM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,050,952 times
Reputation: 17197
It is delightful seeing them whine.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:39 AM
 
13,414 posts, read 9,947,270 times
Reputation: 14351
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Why would he need to? Why wouldn't everyone understand that those are exactly the circumstances?
Because he said quite clearly that they don't know yet whether the emails are significant.

Why wouldn't we take him at his word?
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:39 AM
 
4,587 posts, read 2,597,453 times
Reputation: 2349
Its politics no one is furious.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:39 AM
 
34,037 posts, read 17,050,952 times
Reputation: 17197
Quote:
Originally Posted by grumpy ol' man View Post
he doesn't have to say anything, he holds all of the cards. He will should you the indictment once it comes down, then we can watch the old crow have another attack...
He has mounds of evidence or he wouldn't have made the brazen move, he owe neither you of crooked hillary any explanation at this time.
This give you and the old bat plenty of time to stew in your own juices,,,
love it, justice is finally on the way..

true.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:39 AM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,908,241 times
Reputation: 6714
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
But he's saying he doesn't know if the emails are significant, not that he has substantial evidence.

Is he lying?
He isn't lying, he is holding his cards close to the vest. He will tell you when he is ready... Sweet dreams until that time...
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:40 AM
 
13,414 posts, read 9,947,270 times
Reputation: 14351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy ol' Man View Post
He doesn't have to say anything, he holds all of the cards. He will should you the indictment once it comes down, then we can watch the old crow have another attack...
He has mounds of evidence or he wouldn't have made the brazen move, he owe neither you of crooked hillary any explanation at this time.
This give you and the old bat plenty of time to stew in your own juices,,,
LOVE IT, Justice is finally on the way..
Oh, so he's playing some kind of political game? Is that it?

He said they don't know yet whether the emails are significant. Is he lying to Congress?
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:41 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
88,989 posts, read 44,804,275 times
Reputation: 13693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
The DoJ actually told him that if he went to the media, he would violate their rules and he would be operating independently from the department.
Obama's corrupt DoJ? Please...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top