Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:41 AM
Status: "Smartened up and walked away!" (set 26 days ago)
 
11,780 posts, read 5,792,331 times
Reputation: 14201

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by First24 View Post
I don't consider myself a "liberal", but I'm more furious about how an alleged rapist and sexual predator was nominated for the presidency.

Some of you fools are comparing a email scandal to that!?! Seriously?
You're post says it all "alleged" and have you bothered to really look into these claims, considered the timing, read family reports about the accusers - no - just believe what others post here and what the news says.

 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:41 AM
 
Location: NE Atlanta Metro
3,197 posts, read 5,375,526 times
Reputation: 3197
Quote:
Originally Posted by azliam View Post
let's not bring bill clinton into this.
NO! Trump silly!
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:41 AM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,909,203 times
Reputation: 6714
Quote:
Originally Posted by SunGrins View Post
Comey said Hillary was "extremely careless" and then goes and pulls a stunt that shows what extremely careless is all about (giving him the benefit of the doubt). He hasn't seen the emails, they were not on Clinton's server, they were not written or sent by her, they were not sent to her, and may actually be duplicates of emails already reviewed by the FBI. There is no story here other than the fact that Comey couldn't resist intentionally running his mouth in the last days of the election. He did this contrary to the rules of the FBI and in opposition to warnings from DOJ superiors. This sounds like a poor impression of a J. Edgar Hoover stunt.


Someone needs to investigate Comey because he did this independently in the guise of an official notice and with the intent to influence the election.
I already investigated him and I give him two thumbs up... Sleep tight....
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:41 AM
 
13,422 posts, read 9,950,386 times
Reputation: 14356
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy ol' Man View Post
He isn't lying, he is holding his cards close to the vest. He will tell you when he is ready... Sweet dreams until that time...
Well then the statement that they have not assessed whether the emails are significant is what? Is it not true?
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:42 AM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,909,203 times
Reputation: 6714
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucFan View Post
Comey broke protocol.
hillary broke the law... bye bye...
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:43 AM
 
34,048 posts, read 17,064,521 times
Reputation: 17205
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy ol' Man View Post
... Sleep tight....

Rhymes with "Her indictment is gonna bite".


 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by bUU View Post
Comey himself said his letter to Congress violated standard practice. That isn't even a matter in question.
Right. Matthew Miller, a former DoJ spokesman, said Comey's violation is flagrant. http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/form...ted-doj-rules/

Ironically when the Congress asked Comey if FBI was investigating Trumps association with Russian hacks, Comey told them he cannot discuss ingoing investigations.

So, if the investigation is about Trump, he cannot discuss it, but if its about Hillary, he rushes straight to the media to spill the beans.
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:44 AM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,909,203 times
Reputation: 6714
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
Because he said quite clearly that they don't know yet whether the emails are significant.
He knows full well that he has plenty of evidence, he doesn't have to tell you anything...
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:46 AM
 
6,738 posts, read 2,909,203 times
Reputation: 6714
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinsterRufus View Post
Well then the statement that they have not assessed whether the emails are significant is what? Is it not true?
Such desperation as I have never witnessed before. he has the goods, you will know when he is ready to tell...
 
Old 10-29-2016, 11:46 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,621,806 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Obama's corrupt DoJ? Please...
You think they invented new rules? They didn't.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top