Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And let people decide again whom they want to vote for given all the information still coming out? Should we really have early voting at all given information that percolates to the top right up to election day?
What happens if something really serious comes out 2 days before election day?
No, why would they?
Nothing serious is going to come out ever, but they do keep trying.
Listen, this election we have a choice between sucks and stinks, so the rather large portion of the voting public are going to question their vote no matter what day they vote or what new news comes out or who they finally flip the switch for.
In the immortal words of one of our awful candidate choices, "What difference does it make?"
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
Listen, this election we have a choice between sucks and stinks, so the rather large portion of the voting public are going to question their vote no matter what day they vote or what new news comes out or who they finally flip the switch for.
In the immortal words of one of our awful candidate choices, "What difference does it make?"
I agree, we are left with some rather "distasteful" choices but that is the way our system is currently working.
Again, on the theory that all the relevant information has not been revealed/isn't all in yet. This situation has never been seen before so I was asking the question under the thought that unique situations sometimes require unique solutions.
I don't see why anyone would be afraid of such an idea, unless they're afraid people might just change the vote away from the person THEY want to win...
I agree, we are left with some rather "distasteful" choices but that is the way our system is currently working.
Again, on the theory that all the relevant information has not been revealed/isn't all in yet. This situation has never been seen before so I was asking the question under the thought that unique situations sometimes require unique solutions.
I don't see why anyone would be afraid of such an idea, unless they're afraid people might just change the vote away from the person THEY want to win...
I assure you there are more goodies still hidden on both of these Pinocchios. Are you proposing that if one of those nuggets gets leaked on Nov 10th that we should have a do-over election? If that is the new way of doing things I want a do-over primary.
__________________
When I post in bold red that is moderator action and, per the TOS, can only be discussed through Direct Message.
Moderator - Diabetes and Kentucky (including Lexington & Louisville)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
