Of course they did. And of course Hillshills can't understand the difference between "like the person" and "like the action". Conservatives still don't like Comey. How many fricken times must we point out how disgusted we are that he did not do his job properly. When he announced he was reopening the case, it didn't mean that we suddenly liked Comey again, it was just a relief that finally the job was going to be done right. Hillshills have no concept of that because they don't live in reality.
What is really happening:
Fmr U.S. Atty: Comey's Hand Forced by FBI 'Seething' Anger at Botched Hillary Email Investigation - Breitbart
Quote:
|
The picture painted by DiGenova, based on what he says are discussions with current and former FBI agents, is one of “seething” rage inside the Bureau at the way Comey handled the investigation concerning Hillary Clinton’s private email server. Mr. DiGenova eviscerated the way Comey conducted his investigation and explained that he believes it has tarnished the FBI director’s reputation permanently...
|
Anyway, here is why the Dems love Comey:
Quote:
...The original so-called ‘investigation’ was not an investigation. It was not thorough. It was not professional. As far as we know there was no grand jury, which an ordinary investigation would have. There were no grand jury subpoenas, there were no search warrants. Immunities were given out like candy. Attorneys were allowed to represent multiple witnesses and defendants which is completely inconsistent with federal policy and ethical standards. The list is endless.
The original investigation was not intended to be a real investigation. Comey decided — for political reasons– that he wanted to exonerate Hillary Clinton and the only answer to why he wanted to do that was because he didn’t want to be responsible for recommending the prosecution of the first female nominee of a major political party for President of the United States.
They followed none of the protocols that they ordinarily would have attained in such a prosecution. And the proof that that is the case is the letter that he sent to Congress, in which he announced that he was basically reopening the case because they had newly discovered evidence which was evidence on the laptop shared by Huma Abedin and her husband Anthony Weiner. If the original investigation had been conducted properly they would have known about that laptop, and they would have known about the tens of thousands of emails that related to the earlier investigation.
|
So of course the Dems love him. He is just as corrupt as they are. The problem is, others did not support what he did, were angry about his so called investigation, and when it came out that there was another device linked to Huma that she did not claim, well...it was either write that letter and save face, or have the entire nation know what a corrupt pile he is.
That's why he released the letter on Friday, for all of those still wondering why he did it and what it all means:
Quote:
|
...Well, he didn’t have any choice. He had to send the letter once he was confronted with the evidence of the New York investigation. If he hadn’t sent the letter, there would have been leaks out of New York and he would have been embarrassed. So, he sent the letter because he didn’t have any choice and it’s as simple as that. I mean, they were gonna leak it, and he knew it.
|
Oops, we still know. Maybe he should have done his job correctly the first time.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
