Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-10-2016, 05:49 AM
 
Location: Chicago Area
12,687 posts, read 6,728,975 times
Reputation: 6593

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alandros View Post
As of now:

Hillary Clinton - 59,814,018
Donald Trump - 59,611,678


So no, the people didn't vote Trump in, he won based on Electoral College technicalities (a shame James Madison didn't get his wish in the Constitutional convention to get a popular vote). The people chose Hillary.

In the end this is heavily split however, revealing we really need to get better at compromise. Democrats lost via the legitimate election system, so they need to concede some things. Republicans now have a President that will go in losing the popular vote (like 2000 with George W Bush but even a bigger margin, so we've had our second Republican President in 16 years not elected by a Democracy) and can't make the argument more people chose him, so they will need to concede some things.
Truly a tiny margin, but a win nonetheless.

This brings up the same old tired argument. Should we get rid of the Electoral College and switch to a pure popular vote model? In principal, I don't have a problem with the idea. But this requires an Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Electoral College functions exactly as the founding fathers designed it to. The smaller states wanted to be sure that their voices weren't constantly drowned out and ignored in favor of the more populated states. At present, all states with six electors or fewer gain a clear over-representation advantage in every presidential election. That's a pretty large group:
  1. Alaska
  2. Hawaii
  3. Nevada
  4. Montana
  5. Wyoming
  6. Idaho
  7. Utah
  8. New Mexico
  9. Kansas
  10. Nebraska
  11. South Dakota
  12. North Dakota
  13. Iowa
  14. Arkansas
  15. Mississippi
  16. West Virginia
  17. Delaware
  18. Rhode Island
  19. Vermont
  20. New Hampshire
  21. Maine

In order to Amend the Constitution and abolish the Electoral College, you need 3/4 of the States to vote in favor. That means 38 of the 50. For starters, the 29 states not listed would all have to agree that the abolition of the Electoral College is critically important. Many of them, especially the smaller ones, might not be onboard. Then you have to convince at least 9 of the 21 states the I've listed to willingly make themselves less important, less significant and less powerful in all future presidential elections. Reality check: None of them will ever do that. Most of the remaining 29 states won't care enough anyways. Yes the principal is sound enough, but your asking human beings to intentionally make themselves less important than they are currently.

And that is why it's never going to happen.

Also worth noting: Hillary might have gotten the lion's share of the popular vote, but she did not get over the 50% majority mark. So in the end, the majority of voters did vote against her and not for her.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-10-2016, 05:52 AM
 
Location: The canyon (with my pistols and knife)
14,186 posts, read 22,725,360 times
Reputation: 17388
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Haha Hillary Clinton had more votes-fyi
Illegal aliens and voter fraud can likely explain the entire difference in the popular vote advantage for Hillary Clinton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2016, 05:54 AM
 
Location: Elysium
12,382 posts, read 8,134,444 times
Reputation: 9192
If we did elect by popular vote the strategies of the candidates would have been different. Los Angeles and New York City would have served as more than ATMs for the campaigns as candidates would have tried to siphon off that extra 1% in those big cities rather than trying to capture that extra 1% in Miami or Cleveland.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2016, 06:03 AM
 
Location: az
13,682 posts, read 7,973,244 times
Reputation: 9380
Quote:
Originally Posted by godofthunder9010 View Post
Truly a tiny margin, but a win nonetheless.
True. And the libs can take that home as a consolation prize.

(Although I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to learn cheating went on regarding the Cal. ballots to ensure HC won the popular vote.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2016, 06:09 AM
 
33,308 posts, read 12,484,756 times
Reputation: 14897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vacanegro View Post
All this shows is that Hillary, the supposed consummate politician with a huge, purportedly competent machine behind her, ran an absolutely horrid campaign.

Seriously how could she miss so badly in Pennsylvania, Michigan and especially Florida ? Where will the public relations pros who knew just what to say to influence the vote, the Democratic volunteers getting out the millennial vote along with the supporting minorities. Hell she almost won that Reddest of Red states - Texas
....and not returning to Wisconsin at all after the convention...might have been one of the fatal campaign mistakes.

Quote:
In the end it was Trump who played the right tune to the people and proved the more savvy of public opinion, despite all the negative news stories surrounding his behavior.
I also think that trying to say that he has complete contempt (as some have said) for the details of what 'working people' do is silly. The POTUS elect's oldest son Don Jr. put his foot in his mouth a few times during the campaign, but I found one particular thing he said interesting....referring to himself (and at least Eric and Ivanka) "We are probably the only children of a billionaire who know how to operate heavy equipment (meaning re construction)" .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2016, 06:11 AM
 
Location: FAIRFAX, VA
599 posts, read 692,894 times
Reputation: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
We are a republic of states. That's who we are. We do not choose presidents via the popular vote.

California (+2.6 million), New York (+1.5 million) are the reason HRC won the popular vote. Which means collectively in 48 states, it wasn't close.

Trump won 30 states, HRC won 20 (based on the current numbers). That's a landslide for Trump.

The electoral college is a hybrid system that factors in states and population.
Exactly ..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2016, 06:16 AM
 
Location: Destin, FL
237 posts, read 245,513 times
Reputation: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by back2MD View Post
Exactly ..
Too bad they always ignore the facts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2016, 06:18 AM
 
11,558 posts, read 12,045,715 times
Reputation: 17757
Let's see now, Hillary won the popular vote . . . well, to quote her:

"What difference at this point does it make?!!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2016, 06:24 AM
 
33,308 posts, read 12,484,756 times
Reputation: 14897
Quote:
Originally Posted by erjunkee View Post
someone please educate me:

Why do these 2 different types of votes (electoral vs. popular) exist in the presidential election?
lots of other great replies so far to your question above ^^^^^ that each give great new information. I'll add another link that covers some things that may not have been covered yet....

....Why we have 435 of the 538 electors, why that number is currently 435, what that number has been in the past, and the 'nuts and bolts' of the number:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reappo...nt_Act_of_1929
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2016, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Unplugged from the matrix
4,754 posts, read 2,971,509 times
Reputation: 5126
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperOscar View Post
Yet all the Trump supporters would have blown a gasket if Trump had lost the Electoral Vote, yet won the popular vote. Trump would be calling the system rigged and refusing to concede. Though, since your guy won, you guys don't care about it being "rigged." Which isn't a surprise to anyone.
And if Trump had said anything about using the popular vote over the EC before the election, then the media and democrats everywhere would be saying Trump wants to change the system and doesn't believe in the process. Please. So much whining going around. It's ridiculous and I'm embarassed for some of my fellow millenials doing these things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top