Statistician: It Is 99.9% Certain That Hillary Clinton Will Win (campaign, illegal, Obama)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Highly respected statistician Sam Wang at Princeton University does continuously updated statistical analysis of polls. He has analyzed prior elections and one of the key factors he has calculated is how fast do polls move, not just one poll, but all of them together. In other words, when all polls shift two points, they do not shift instantly or overnight. It takes a number of days for the opinions of millions of people to change.
Based on where the polls are today with just 5 days left, Wang's calculations show that there is not enough time remaining for Trump to catch and pass Clinton. You can see it on the Median EV Estimator chart here. The red band is the maximum change with 66% certainty, while the yellow has 99% certainty. Since the yellow band is higher than 270 for Clinton, the stats say it is extremely unlikely for Trump to win.
Highly respected statistician Sam Wang at Princeton University does continuously updated statistical analysis of polls. He has analyzed prior elections and one of the key factors he has calculated is how fast do polls move, not just one poll, but all of them together. In other words, when all polls shift two points, they do not shift instantly or overnight. It takes a number of days for the opinions of millions of people to change.
Based on where the polls are today with just 5 days left, Wang's calculations show that there is not enough time remaining for Trump to catch and pass Clinton. You can see it on the Median EV Estimator chart here. The red band is the maximum change with 66% certainty, while the yellow has 99% certainty. Since the yellow band is higher than 270 for Clinton, the stats say it is extremely unlikely for Trump to win.
Higher than 270 for Clinton? Funny how y'all could count Electoral College Votes pre-Election.
Higher than 270 for Clinton? Funny how y'all could count Electoral College Votes pre-Election.
This Wang guy probably should have read the wikileaks. If he had, he would have known that the Democrat party and media actively colluded to rig polls by oversampling Democrats.
A poll is only as good the people taking it, meaning in this case, they all stunk like ****.
LOL, the same Trumpsters who trash the polls are now touting his rising poll numbers!
Conservatives hated the polls before they loved them...
As Trump points out, even the Fake Polls are starting to come around. Most polls exist solely for the purpose of advancing the liberal/globalist agenda.
LOL, the same Trumpsters who trash the polls are now touting his rising poll numbers!
Conservatives hated the polls before they loved them...
Apparently they know to add 10+ points to any poll. Anyway, Trumpsters can easily take the high road against the Rapist Clinton and the Nation destroying Obama. Ever notice what ever Leftist accuse Trump of "anything" they have done the same thing but much worse.
Highly respected statistician Sam Wang at Princeton University does continuously updated statistical analysis of polls. He has analyzed prior elections and one of the key factors he has calculated is how fast do polls move, not just one poll, but all of them together. In other words, when all polls shift two points, they do not shift instantly or overnight. It takes a number of days for the opinions of millions of people to change.
Based on where the polls are today with just 5 days left, Wang's calculations show that there is not enough time remaining for Trump to catch and pass Clinton. You can see it on the Median EV Estimator chart here. The red band is the maximum change with 66% certainty, while the yellow has 99% certainty. Since the yellow band is higher than 270 for Clinton, the stats say it is extremely unlikely for Trump to win.
Oh how I love these posts!!
And in other news, there is a House Intelligence Committee memo that proves Russian collusion in the 2016 election; collusion with the Democrats. Awkward ....
1. Underestimated the number of fed up people
2. Overestimated the number of people who liked Hillary Clinton
3. Underestimated the corruption in the democratic party
4. Overestimated Hillary Clinton's intelligence
5. Undercounted Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Ohio
6. Overestimated the importance of the popular vote
In short, Mr. Wang needs to find a new job --- like, bagging groceries.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.