Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Does Clinton's Popular Vote Victory Reduce Trump's Mandate?
YES. Trump's vote count is too low to be a mandate for sweeping change. 70 27.89%
NO. Trump won, and that's reason enough for a mandate for sweeping change. 125 49.80%
DOESN'T MATTER. The mandate concept is too vague to mean anything. 56 22.31%
Voters: 251. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2016, 02:30 AM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,838,779 times
Reputation: 17241

Advertisements

Hey dont let it bother you,YOU GOT MORE ADDED POINTS FOR THIER STUPID REMARK!! (You made out good bud)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2016, 06:29 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,858,353 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
UPDATE -- CLINTON POPULAR VOTE MARGIN EXCEEDS 2.2 MILLION

Popular vote count Nov. 26 1300 PST

Clinton.... 64,637,503... 48.2%
Trump...... 62,409,389... 46.5% <<< Margin has increased to 1.7%


Clinton lead = 2,228,114 [1.7%] (source: Cook Political Report)
Meh, Who cares about the Popular vote, Look at how Trump crushed HilLIARy in Square footage.
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...tymaprb512.png

Trump won both the Electoral college (you know the only one that really matters) and square feet of America

HilLIARy only got the PV (basically in California).

President Trump!


bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 07:28 AM
 
8,498 posts, read 4,559,995 times
Reputation: 9753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elliott_CA View Post
UPDATE -- CLINTON POPULAR VOTE MARGIN EXCEEDS 2.2 MILLION

Popular vote count Nov. 26 1300 PST

Clinton.... 64,637,503... 48.2%
Trump...... 62,409,389... 46.5% <<< Margin has increased to 1.7%


Clinton lead = 2,228,114 [1.7%] (source: Cook Political Report)


Herr Trump falls even further behind. The margin is now approaching 2%. Wow. The popular vote and electoral college are really out of whack with one another.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 07:43 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,550 posts, read 17,223,445 times
Reputation: 17589
Trying to 'legitimize' trump's presidency and create a rallying point to consolidate wayward dems and dem socialists. nothing like a war to get people together to fight a common enemy. Media support is required.


It would be a disservice to real democrats to keep the democrat name for the party.


Hillary decried the idea of a recount.


Interesting if you google 'hillary decries trump rigged election' hillary decries rigged election' and the first two pages just list Trump calling the election rigged....no mention of hillary's now famous speech where she recoiled at the thought of a recount or rigged election.


You'd have to search creatively to find that video of hillary recoiling at the thought elections are rigged and trump is horrible for saying it.


the media is still at it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 07:50 AM
 
84 posts, read 76,915 times
Reputation: 92
Senators, governors, congressmen, etc are all elected by popular vote. So why not the president? The electoral college is a sham and voter suppression for both democrats and republicans.

Trump was elected president by the electoral college. The majority of the people in this country did not want Donald Trump as president. That is a fact that will never be able to be disputed as evidenced by the popular vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 07:52 AM
 
2,407 posts, read 1,504,854 times
Reputation: 1453
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
No they wouldn't. Didn't you listen to your lord and savior Donald Trump. He said he would have been able to pick up millions more votes if he targeted New York and California...
And he might have been right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Maine
3,536 posts, read 2,858,353 times
Reputation: 6839
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
No they wouldn't. Didn't you listen to your lord and savior Donald Trump. He said he would have been able to pick up millions more votes if he targeted New York and California...
Your twisted liberal mind may have gotten something right for once, Both candidates ran there campaigns to win the EC if they had run for the PV there campaigns would have been very different, and Trump would most likely still won.



bill
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Native of Any Beach/FL
35,692 posts, read 21,049,622 times
Reputation: 14243
Quote:
Originally Posted by skepticratic View Post
I wouldn't say that's necessarily quite the reason why. The actual reason is that the founders had a profound and reasoned fear of democracy. They felt allowing popular vote would lead to factions of people, in a modern context sometimes called "they tyranny of the majority" that would overwhelm and take the rights of other citizens. The term "United States" existed when the Declaration of Independence was written and that name stuck. The Article of Confederation was the first government "constitution" and it had no president. There was the president of congress, elected every year, who was in no way similar to the President of the constitution. So I don't think the name "United States" has anything to do with what you're saying.

That said, the popular vote still does not matter.

we have that anyways- those electoral are a faction-- --get rid of it and join the world- we are how many million of voters? not longer 3 cats against the Brits-
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 08:27 AM
 
25,847 posts, read 16,525,824 times
Reputation: 16025
Quote:
Originally Posted by dog8food View Post
...we would be called the "United People."

This is the United States because it is the states that are granted the authority to appoint a leader, and thus the electoral college gives a voice to each state.

Cut it out with this popular vote junk. It's happened before and it never mattered.
That pretty much sums it up. I learned this in grade school and understood it then. The popular vote is just a talking point but anyone with a functioning brain knows this is a Republic of States and States have rights.

Think about it, without the Electoral College, would there even be a United States? How crazy would South Dakota and North Dakota be to want to stay as part of this association when they really have no say in anything?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-27-2016, 08:40 AM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,096,970 times
Reputation: 6842
If the popular vote mattered they would have run different campaigns
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:24 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top