Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yes but it seems the "same fake article" is hitting the news media. Wait for a live report, of Hillary talking about a recount, otherwise... this is just one news media article transferring to other news medias from a possible fake article. Not saying it's fake or real. I need proof. The only proof will be Hillary, not 6 news stations repeating what they read on the internet.
If this is fake, it's doing just what it is meant to do...stir up the whole nation. Those for Trump and those for Hillary.
Clinton's failure to find any evidence of vote tampering was not for a lack of trying. Elias also highlighted the five steps they took, including having "lawyers and data scientists and analysts combing over the results to spot anomalies that would suggest a hacked result," to come up with some reason to launch their own election challenge.
Why is it so hard to believe that Hillary simply lost the election? Why is it so hard for the left to believe that people have a mind of their own and don't automatically do as their main stream media tells them?
For the people's sake, give Hillary a participation trophy to make her feel better.
What I'm saying is, it doesn't matter. Neither side is independent of the money that has corrupted the American political system...The best thing the individual can do is make sure their local government is strong and (relatively) independent of the party establishment.
Speaking of money, I would appreciate your best-guestimate. Who is responsible for the $5 million dollars sent to Stein? Who controls and watches over the money? Anybody? If she does not use all of it for a recount, where does it go?
I find it disturbing that someone can generate this kind of money and not be held accountable for every dollar spent. Call me old-fashioned ...I guess!
Before election: "Voter fraud is rampant, so we need Voter ID!"
After election: "Just shut up and accept the results of the election, even if polls were wildly wrong...nothing to see here! Heil Trump!"
Hardly. I'd be perfectly happy to see those recounted votes reconciled with the voter's registration lists in each of those states where recounts are taking place. Just to make sure all those votes are from legal, registered voters, and see just how many of those legal votes (ie, excluding the votes from dead people, illegal aliens, and multiple votes from single individuals) went to Hillary. Seems only fair, isn't it, if Jill Stein and the Hillary voters are so concerned about the integrity of the process, right?
As to why they're raising money for those recounts when both Jill Stein, and Hillary's campaign attorney agree that there is no evidence that the election was hacked and they aren't expecting the recounts to change the outcome in any of those states remains anyone's guess. IMO they're playing it as a feel good measure to appeal to their whining supporters, and of course it IS another way to extract a few more dollars from their supporters' pockets as they do so.
That is the problem with digital voting and digital communication and news broadcasting. It is deceptive and evil...some say that the world wide web...is the beast...well it just might be...If they do one recount - then the other side will demand a recount..and so on and so on.
If people believe that hacking took place then the hackers can continue to re-hack and re-hack...What was wrong with using pieces of physical paper that can be manually counted?
Clinton's failure to find any evidence of vote tampering was not for a lack of trying. Elias also highlighted the five steps they took, including having "lawyers and data scientists and analysts combing over the results to spot anomalies that would suggest a hacked result," to come up with some reason to launch their own election challenge.
It took forever to call Michigan. You can bet Hillary's people have already been all over the votes there. If they had found something they wouldn't need to do anything other than take it to the courts. There is nothing there.
Hillary was told she was going to lose Ohio/Michigan/Pennsylvania but she was too arrogant to understand why.
Quote:
Why is it so hard to believe that Hillary simply lost the election? Why is it so hard for the left to believe that people have a mind of their own and don't automatically do as their main stream media tells them?
For the people's sake, give Hillary a participation trophy to make her feel better.
I imagine she is fishing for a state to say no so she can say "what are they hiding"? It's not going to matter. It might have a small effect if she was likable. She isn't.
WOW ... CNN reporting that Reckless Donnie's COMBINED margin of 'victory' in MI, WI, and PA is only about "107,000 votes".
Let's get those re-counts started...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
