Do you think america should formally take in to account "the illegal vote"? (security, Hillary Clinton)

[Valhallian]

More like "no, we should stop pretending this is a real problem."

[Compression]

Originally Posted by convextech

Neither; this poll is a joke.

This^

No body needs to "pretend" that an illegal alien shouldn't vote. They shouldn't.......period.

They are illegal, they shouldn't be here, at all. If they are found to have voted, their vote should be nullified, immediatley.

And they are not a part of the voting base, significant, or otherwise.


CN

[OotsaPootsa]

Originally Posted by jetgraphics

Ah, how we miss the old days when only land owning, tax paying, civic minded militia men (active from 18-50) could vote and hold public office.

When women, black people, Indians etc. were not allowed to vote or hod office?

Originally Posted by jetgraphics

Here we are today, the result of a "democratic" system that any warm body is allowed to vote

I didn't know that was the case. Can you list the states where being alive is the only requirement at the polls, please? Thanks!

Originally Posted by jetgraphics

by fraud, the dead and non-citizens, so we can "elect" the best government money can buy!

Is that how Trump won the Rust Belt states that gave him the win?

[OotsaPootsa]

Originally Posted by Compression

If they are found to have voted, their vote should be nullified, immediatley.

I've seen no credible evidence that an illegal alien voted. Have you?

Originally Posted by Compression

And they are not a part of the voting base, significant, or otherwise.

That's correct.

[OotsaPootsa]

Originally Posted by WaldoKitty

True. But any of them found to have voted in the election should be immediately deported. They are criminals who continue to commit criminal (illegal voting) acts.

I agree. First you'll need to prove they voted illegally, then you'll need to round them up and deport them.

Get back to me when you've completed the first step, will you?

[Soup Not See]

Originally Posted by OotsaPootsa

I agree. First you'll need to prove they voted illegally, then you'll need to round them up and deport them.

Get back to me when you've completed the first step, will you?

No let's just reverse the process and deport the illegals first. We won't have to get back to you as you'll know when it happens.

[Compression]

Originally Posted by OotsaPootsa

I agree. First you'll need to prove they voted illegally, then you'll need to round them up and deport them.

Get back to me when you've completed the first step, will you?

That is a very good argument for requiring I.D. at the polling place.


CN

[scgraham]

If sanctuary-city mayors are corrupt enough to not enforce federal immigration laws, then how can they be trusted to enforce election/voting laws? There's no telling how many votes were potentially illegally cast in these corruptly-run democratic areas. So, the popular vote has a huge question mark over it. Lastly, JFK send 400 Marshals in Alabama to enforce federal laws on discrimination, so similar steps should be done to these mayors.

"The marshals were dispatched to Alabama under authority of an 1871 statute which also had been the legal basis for the sending of troops to Little Rock.

The statute says that the President may use "the militia or the armed forces * * * or any other means * * * to suppress in a state any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy" under certain specified conditions.

These conditions are that a class of citizens is deprived of a constitutional right "and the constituted authorities of that state are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right."

Liberal source ==> 400 U.S. Marshals Sent to Alabama as Montgomery Bus Riots Hurt 20; President Bids State Keep Order

[Mircea]

Originally Posted by MikeNigh

Until strict voting id's are enforced do you think the US should include in debates what the illegals want in a president?

That would be Aiding & Abetting, which is a Federal crime. Illegals should be marginalized, not elevated.

[Enigma777]

Originally Posted by MikeNigh

Until strict voting id's are enforced do you think the US should include in debates what the illegals want in a president?

Sure--as soon as anyone at all can prove it exists. It's like Bigfoot.

Where's your proof?