Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The election system makes it very difficult for a woman to win it.
Hillary never got less votes than her opponent, but she could not win some key demographics which cost her the election.
She would have been the president easily if every vote matters the same, but that's not the case so despite winning over by almost 3 million votes, she lost because of 80k votes in the rust belt.
I don't think she should bother running again.
Hopefully Trump will implement stricker voting laws across the country so illegal immigrants can't vote.
We already know Trump is likely to win again in 2020. But if the democrats run Hillary again, it will pretty much guarantee his victory.
So go ahead and run the "vote for me because I'm a woman" campaign again, democrats. Keep demonstrating to the world that you are not capable of learning.
We already know Trump is likely to win again in 2020. But if the democrats run Hillary again, it will pretty much guarantee his victory.
So go ahead and run the "vote for me because I'm a woman" campaign again, democrats. Keep demonstrating to the world that you are not capable of learning.
I think we are getting way ahead of ourselves: 1-I don't care what Politico, the liberal blog has to say, it is very doubtful she would run again: her age and perhaps her health are reasons she will not be seen in the political arena anymore and 2-there is no reason to believe he will seek a second term. He is having enough problems right now, it appears Malania is not in love with the political scene though she is doing a goo job and his age will also be a factor. I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't last 4 years. It is way to soon to start the "what ifs" game. This is just my opinion.
The election system makes it very difficult for a woman to win it.
Hillary never got less votes than her opponent, but she could not win some key demographics which cost her the election.
She would have been the president easily if every vote matters the same, but that's not the case so despite winning over by almost 3 million votes, she lost because of 80k votes in the rust belt.
I don't think she should bother running again.
OMG; not again; this has nothing to do with a women running: the right women could win in a heartbeat; the country is waitint for her, but she isn't a Democrat that's for sure. You can be a liberal and become president; you can be a women and become president but you can't be both a women and a liberal and get elected.
BTW, where did you get your education: 80 3 million minus 80, 000 should have still put her over the top. Either you do not know how to do math or you are forgetting her 3 million votes were mostly in California and New York. How many states did she carry conpared to our President?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You can be a liberal and become president; you can be a women and become president but you can't be both a women and a liberal and get elected. 
