Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
if the republican national committee was successful in pushing their candidate through, it would have been jeb bush or marco rubio against hillary, and at that point it would not have mattered who won the election, as the democrats would be the winners.
thank you bob. perhaps one day you liberals will actually READ and understand the constitution, and why it was created, and then you will become conservatives, and liberals will never again win elections.
Marco Rubio was doing much better than trump in general election polls, he is less polarizing!
Marco Rubio was doing much better than trump in general election polls, he is less polarizing!
Rubio would have lost. The media would have treated him like they did Mitt Romney, and it would have been 50%-47% or something like that, with Crooked Hillary winning. Sorry - we learned our lesson this time around, you didn't get an establishment guy to kick around.
if the republican national committee was successful in pushing their candidate through, it would have been jeb bush or marco rubio against hillary, and at that point it would not have mattered who won the election, as the democrats would be the winners.
Had it not been for Trump, the JEB vs Rubio race would have been interesting. Rubio benefited from Trump attacking JEB right off and also in getting the endorsement from Nikki Haley.
Without Trump on the other hand, JEB might have been able to take that $150M war chest and nip Rubio before he even got started.
Given what it took for Trump to take down Hillary and the MSM who backed her 100%, I don't think either would have had it in them to beat Hillary.
Marco Rubio was doing much better than trump in general election polls, he is less polarizing!
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty
Had it not been for Trump, the JEB vs Rubio race would have been interesting. Rubio benefited from Trump attacking JEB right off and also in getting the endorsement from Nikki Haley.
Without Trump on the other hand, JEB might have been able to take that $150M war chest and nip Rubio before he even got started.
Given what it took for Trump to take down Hillary and the MSM who backed her 100%, I don't think either would have had it in them to beat Hillary.
but it would not have mattered in the end. if hillary beat either one, or if either one had beaten hillary, we would have had four more years of obama policies.
but it would not have mattered in the end. if hillary beat either one, or if either one had beaten hillary, we would have had four more years of obama policies.
Fact check: Every economic measure significantly improved during the years within Obama administration!
Marco Rubio was doing much better than trump in general election polls, he is less polarizing!
And, Hillary was doing better than Trump in the general election polls, so, your point?
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty
Had it not been for Trump, the JEB vs Rubio race would have been interesting. Rubio benefited from Trump attacking JEB right off and also in getting the endorsement from Nikki Haley.
Without Trump on the other hand, JEB might have been able to take that $150M war chest and nip Rubio before he even got started.
Given what it took for Trump to take down Hillary and the MSM who backed her 100%, I don't think either would have had it in them to beat Hillary.
I think Jeb would have been the nominee if not for Trump.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoomDan515
So by your logic, if Rubio was the nominee he would of buried Hillary even more then Trump did? If that happened how much crying would you have done?
I don't think the "logic" went in that direction.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daywalk
Fact check: Every economic measure significantly improved during the years within Obama administration!
Increasing the debt by 86%? He was trying to "break" the US.
Again, there is no ribbon for 2nd place. Hillary Clinton defeated herself, therefore, I am convinced that it would have been impossible to find a GOP nominee that would not have beaten her pantsuit off (shield your eyes for that).
Fact check: Every economic measure significantly improved during the years within Obama administration!
at what cost though? yes the stock market went up, but then with the fed constantly feeding it huge amounts of money, it had to go up, at the cost of increasing the debt.
and it goes to show that obama was able to pay off his supporters, with the stimulus package, stealing two automakers from their rightful owners, giving money to eleven solar companies that ultimately went bankrupt, and that money was never repaid to the taxpayers. and yes the unemployment rate went down, but then it would when changes were made to the reporting system that dropped long term unemployed from the roles. at this point the labor participation rates are lower now than at just about any time in history.
Cruz, Rubio, Kasich ?? They would have never beaten Hillary because they are too nice and old school 101.
America is lucky that Trump stood up to challenge her would be reign.
Uh, no.
Kasich would have taken vast swaths of independent voters. Rubio too.
Cruz... Flip a coin. He is Lucifer himself.
Now, put in a likeable Democrat with less baggage...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
