Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-22-2008, 04:30 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,193,095 times
Reputation: 3696

Advertisements

I have worked for two Presidential campaigns, two Congressional campaigns, the campaign to elect my current mayor, was a Tennessee state delegate in 2004 and have written and covered politics for about a decade now and I can say with certainty, that this is the most ridiculous election cycle I have ever been a part of.

Through the years of learning the nuts and bolts of pressing the flesh on the streets, getting petitions signed, manning the phones, handing out flyer's and all the mechanics of being a part of the election process, I have learned a great deal. What has only recently dawned upon me is how cynical and almost depressing it has become when I pause to look around at the landscape today.

People carrying on over the tiniest and most minuscule detail as though it were some grand revelation that is heralding the second coming of the messiah or the anti-Christ. I never would have dreamed that people could fawn over the most ridiculous things with all the seriousness of a declaration of war. In doing so, people have abandoned the issues once again in favor of the sound byte and the clever one liners. Hollow adulation and contempt abounding from the faithful followers so much like idol cult worship.

Who knows, maybe we will all get lucky and California will move up the 2012 primary to 2010 so the candidates can start running their campaigns in 2009, we would hate to miss something.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-22-2008, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Sacramento
14,044 posts, read 27,219,039 times
Reputation: 7373
Quote:
Originally Posted by TnHilltopper View Post
Who knows, maybe we will all get lucky and California will move up the 2012 primary to 2010 so the candidates can start running their campaigns in 2009, we would hate to miss something.
Have you heard something about being compensated by the count of postings in your forum???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2008, 05:50 PM
 
Location: Journey's End
10,203 posts, read 27,120,494 times
Reputation: 3946
The compensation is very colourful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
Have you heard something about being compensated by the count of postings in your forum???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2008, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,330,946 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by ontheroad View Post
The compensation is very colourful.
Damn, I hate cliques


that I don't belong to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2008, 07:02 PM
 
Location: Texas
8,064 posts, read 18,010,195 times
Reputation: 3730
Well, I certainly don't get the fawning end of it. Nor do I get how some seem to have invested so much of their hopes and fondest wishes into a POLITICIAN, for Pete's sake! Crying over a political speech? C'mon! Yep, I support Hillary and I would be heartened to see a woman serve as president but, geez, I'm not emotionally involved in how the campaign is going.

Politics is a comedy of errors, sometimes a calculated chess match. Those willing to run are not likely the best presidents this country can produce -- they're simply the ones ambitious enough, egotistical enough, well-connected, well-monied, and willing to subject themselves, their families, and everything and anyone about them to intense scrutiny. That's not something about which to "ooohhhh" and "aaaahhhh."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2008, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,169 posts, read 24,330,946 times
Reputation: 15291
Quote:
Originally Posted by teatime View Post
Well, I certainly don't get the fawning end of it. Nor do I get how some seem to have invested so much of their hopes and fondest wishes into a POLITICIAN, for Pete's sake! Crying over a political speech? C'mon! Yep, I support Hillary and I would be heartened to see a woman serve as president but, geez, I'm not emotionally involved in how the campaign is going.

Politics is a comedy of errors, sometimes a calculated chess match. Those willing to run are not likely the best presidents this country can produce -- they're simply the ones ambitious enough, egotistical enough, well-connected, well-monied, and willing to subject themselves, their families, and everything and anyone about them to intense scrutiny. That's not something about which to "ooohhhh" and "aaaahhhh."
I agree. It's not the candidates whom I find inspiring. It's the apparently insatiable upspringing of hope which their followers seem to tap.

My Japanese wife laughs at me when I talk like this. She is amused by America's childish faith in political inspiration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2008, 10:19 PM
 
11,135 posts, read 14,193,095 times
Reputation: 3696
I realize we often start out with idealism when campaigns fire up and get going but eventually we have to come around to pragmatism.

Just how have the candidates running voted in the past, how consistently does their voting match their speech, what has been their primary focus and causes for concern during their careers, and how do what views they hold match those of mine.

Now everyone is going to have those things that are most important to them so in turn will effect their choice in candidates. Yet when we have a close race in which two or more candidates have similar views, it comes down to the inevitable cult of personality that drives people.

Maybe it is just the unique candidate choices we have this election cycle that is driving this more than usual, but I have just never seen such fanaticism over non-issue items. Who knows, I guess when lack of difference between issues is present, then all that is left is who has the best hair cut, pant suit, or genuine grin, not to mention who has the gardener that hasn't been embroiled in a scandal with Guatemalan coffee picker that is here illegally.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top