Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 17 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
I simply have no desire to argue semantics with you. All the articles take the same position I do.
This isn't arguing semantics, By saying you take the same position as the article, then you are purposefully lying just as they are.
Its not hard to understand the difference between someone saying an entity should not endorse(put money and infrastructure behind and individual) vs saying individuals can not endorse.
pretending they are the same thing is being intellectually dishonest.
This isn't arguing semantics, By saying you take the same position as the article, then you are purposefully lying just as they are.
Its not hard to understand the difference between someone saying an entity should not endorse(put money and infrastructure behind and individual) vs saying individuals can not endorse.
pretending they are the same thing is being intellectually dishonest.
You can call it semantics all you want.
When he speaks, he speaks as chairman of the DNC. Too many do not trust that there is no money changing hands either.
Don't pretend him endorsing is the same as the DNC doing it, say you don't believe he is genuine when he says the DNC itself will stay out.
It shouldn't have been that hard for you to say that from the beginning instead of falsely equating the 2.
If Perez was not the Chairman of the DNC his endorsement would be worth diddly. You can argue that everyone else is wrong except you if you want. In the end it really matters not. The damage has been done.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 17 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp
If Perez was not the Chairman of the DNC his endorsement would be worth diddly. You can argue that everyone else is wrong except you if you want. In the end it really matters not. The damage has been done.
The truth always matter, not matter how many people spread a lie.
either you are arguing that the DNC head's endorsement carries weight, and therefore he shouldn't do it( which I don't even disagree with you there)
or you are trying to argue that Perez said he would never endorse, in which case you are lying.
You could make a well intentioned argument about the weight of the head of the DNC'S endorsement without lying just because you don't like him.
Cities, even in red states, tend to vote for and are governed by Dems. Atlanta, GA (poverty rate: 24%), and Memphis, TN (poverty rate: 26.9%), for example.
You understand that Atlanta having a 24% poverty rate doesn't change the fact that Calhoun County Georgia has a poverty rate of 38% right ? The debate is not whether or not there is poverty in cities( every city has poverty), but rather if it was higher in rural areas vs the city.
look , I get it, it hurts for you to admit you are wrong. But his is just sad.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
