Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Not a single person, no media outlet, no research economist has been able to misunderstand what Ed Wolf is referring to except you who keep talking about fund managers. Its funny how you can misunderstand something so basic and have no source at all except your imagination.
UCLA. Very left-wing. They don't hate FDR, Medicare, and SS.
Those two economists are not "very left wing". Anyone can find economists saying anything to support their political agenda. There are thousands upon thousands who disagree that FDR sucked.
No, I don't. Wolff is known for conflating "control" with "own." They're not the same. [/i]
You are the only one who is confused about him using control as meaning own, no business paper, research economist or anyone else is confused about it, and you are quoting another economist who also is in agreement with Wolff. Give us a source that says you are right, please and that Wolff refers to what you are saying.
No, you are. Everyone else knows the difference between "own" and "control" and aren't as easily duped by intentionally manipulative deception.
So every economist, every research paper, every business paper, every financial magazine, has been duped by Wolff, and you, with no sources, claim you have found that Wolff is manipulating everyone by using control as in "having ownership of"? Are you serious?
So every economist, every research paper, every business paper, every financial magazine, has been duped by Wolff, and you, with no sources, claim you have found that Wolff is manipulating everyone by using control as in "having ownership of"? Are you serious?
Everyone? No. People like you? Yes.
$27 trillion in investments owned by American workers/retirees says it all.
Then which business paper, financial magazine or research economist claim that he is referring to "manage" instead of own when talking about "control" like you say he does? You give no sources to your claim at all. Its utterly absurd.
Then which business paper, financial magazine or research economist claim that he is referring to "manage" instead of own when talking about "control" like you say he does?
The ones who correctly report "control" instead of "own." And I already cited one from the PhD at USCS.
Come on, Mike... You're flat out wrong about so many things, including who's funding the Urban Institute. It very clearly states who's donated how much in their Financials Report, yet you insist on posting your false claims.
You are deeply confused. Not a single person misunderstand what Wolff is referring to except you.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
